Laserfiche WebLink
koArh c l' nh,lll;;'I'MF.tt'I' - f•tinul <br /> June 2'>, 19H1 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 4:100. 2. No reason or hardship was presented that would prevent the storage <br /> area from being located farther back and in compliance with the <br /> already reduced setback of 10 feet as provided by variance #786. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Building area must comply with required setback. <br /> 2. Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. <br /> #995. Motion by Schwahn, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 5 <br /> feet from required left side yard. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Porch addition will not be closer to side lot line than the re- <br /> sidence. <br /> 2. Location is necessary to utilize existing patio foundation. <br /> 3. Denial of variance will not improve existing side yard conditions. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #996. Motion by Schwahn, second by Kruschke to hold in abeyance for 1 <br /> month at the request of the town board. Motion carried. <br /> #997. Motion by Voges, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 26 <br /> feet from required setback from S.T.H. 69 with the condition that <br /> the additions permitted by this variance shall be removed at the owners <br /> expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to setback and any addi- <br /> tion, except at the extreme rear, would require a variance. <br /> 2. Proposed additions will be farther back from road than the <br /> existing residence. <br /> 3. Denial of variance would prevent reasonable additions to the re- <br /> sidence. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> I. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> . 2. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> 3. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> 4. Hardship is casued by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #098. Motion by Purcell, second by Voges to grant a variance of 10 feet <br /> from flit r c qu i rc cl s;et h e k from C.T.H . "PH" with lip' condition th.ct t hc• <br /> ncicl i I i < n I'c•rmi l ted Icy this vii i,incfe he rcmovc d at Ihc owner r, <br /> expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 . Milkhouse addition is to replace existing milkhouse which is <br /> much closer to the road . <br /> 2. Addition will also be farther back from road than front of barn. <br /> i0111W1 <br />