Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> Minutes - June 26, 1980 <br /> Page 4 <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #896. Motion by Purcell, second by Voges to grant a variance of 1 foot <br /> from required right side yard. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to side yard. <br /> 2. New porch will be in-line with the residence and will not be close <br /> to side lot line. <br /> 3. Other residences in the area are non-conforming as to location and <br /> variances have been granted for additions, etc. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> c. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #897. Motion by Kruschke, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 7 <br /> feet from required setback from Depot Street. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to setback. <br /> 2. Addition will be in-line with existing residence and will not be <br /> closer to the road. <br /> (11, 3. Addition will provide a 1st floor bedroom for wife who cannot cli • <br /> stairs. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> Motion carried. interest <br /> #898. Motion by Schwahn, second. by Purcell to grant a variance of 1,031 <br /> square feet from maximum permitted floor area for an accessory building. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Property was zoned residential in 1950 as per town planning and <br /> before purchase by Mr. Munz. <br /> 2. Property is approximately 58 acres and is being utilized for one <br /> residence. Nearest adjacent residence is several hundred feet to <br /> the East. <br /> 3. A maximum size limitation, in this instance, does not protect ope <br /> space or other concerns of the ordinance. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in eyes+ <br /> c. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #899. Motion by Kruschke, second by Schwahn to grant the special except' .n <br /> permit as proposed. Filled and graded area shall be sodded or seeded wiul <br />