DCPREZ-0000-05644 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

children, he could have done so at that time without rezoning and with no threat to the property rights of his neighbors or to the ecology of the unique Pine Bluff landform. We understand that under prevailing land use law, all properties such as those exclusively zoned A-1 around Pine Bluff must, upon subdivision, be rezoned with a residential land use coding. While we do not automatically oppose action that would subdivide the property, we strongly oppose any such ac whose net effect would be the legal groundwork for additional construct onoon the proposed site. Zoning changes, once approved by a county board, are rarely revokable. Environmental, ecological and esthetic damages brought about by inadvisable construction are irreversible. We ask therefore, that the rezoning application be denied, or at least delayed so that further studies of potential effects of construction on the proposed site can be made by the appropriate county authorities. It was suggested at the May 11 hearing by the chairman of the Dane County Zoning Committee that individual members of the committee, or perhaps a group of them, should personally examine the site before approving any rezoning. As neighboring property owners, extend our invitation to any members of the zoning committee or other members of the Dane County Board who wish to visit Pine Bluff for this purpose. We are certain that a compromise can be found which will in the long term protect Pine Bluff and the public interest along with the rights of all the property owners, including Mr Connors. 0414,1 gh,v; 3Y27 Cdorry go A . ', ,c9_,,,._s_ u 27 Cc2u/V? c� Rd p C:-(,,oet-13-4,1L), 1W66- ilicA,_(ii _ Pi. darcb i /6 N.s_: ygs' _6,,,i:J /0-LfEcal,. r* -- ;' /& -(Ct•-f) 3ips011). isiZikcsiefo _ E/1.517.5 V.t., .rwq, p,6-)0._,,,L._ -J 4:Z•'7 1,16- . P Kt'.14-,4e.- J ice 44:Z.tc.a/ .6 Y�3 347. r Ai,. X ILL A 3- ?3 3 •