DCPREZ-0000-05644 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. 6/8/93 to: Zoning and Natural Resources Committee Dane County Board City-County Building #116 JON t, Madison WI 53709 copy: Dane County Community & Regional Planning Committ tNING of �NING piy, from: Arnold Harris, Stefanija Harris, Virginia R Cade, Oscar R Cade Mount Horeb WI 53572 re: Zoning petition #5644, 4175 County Rd J, Mount Horeb WI (Pine Bluff) Based on field inspection at the proposed site by the zoning committee members last Tuesday, June 1 , and further, on followup discussion with committee chairman Lyman Anderson, we welcome a compromise solution to the disputed zoning case cited above, based on the following principles: 1 ) Donald P Connors, the petitioner, should be permitted to split his existing 2.7 acre property into two parcels, Parcel A, which would include the existing house on the site, and Parcel B, in a configuration that include at least one acre for proposed Parcel B so that future construction of a single- family residential building would not be excluded automatically because of insufficient parcel size. 2) A deed restriction or special zoning provision should be entered for proposed Parcel B for purpose of confining the siting of any future construction to the lower (northernmost) part of the parcel at or near the bottom of the steep slope of Pine Bluff, so that any such construction shall be relatively close to the existing houses at 4165, 4175 and 4177 County Rd J. If any construction should be permitted partway up the north slope, a minimum 50 feet should be maintained between the highest point of the building and the bluff top immediately above the building site, as was done by home builders on the south slope of the bluff. The septic system for any such construction should be sited at the slope base. 3) The highway right-of-way conveyance bordering most of proposed Parcel B on the east side and which extends 150 feet around the inside curve of County Rd P, should be field-surveyed and clearly marked so that county-owned land is not infringed upon by future construction, and so that present ambiguities about the exact location of all parts of the right-of-way line are resolved. 4) Removal of or damage to trees and other natural vegetation on the north slope of the bluff should be minimalized, in order to maintain the present bluffside ecology, to protect the bluff from extensive soil runoff, and to avoid destruction of the natural vegetation on the neighboring properties. (e) - `��1 -L � _i3 r1]1L ri Le LA ki.n ddf Jy/2 /)() p OW-a:JP .3S'27 7 R� P MT, f/oee6 co, ?98 -9e33