|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-05652
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-05652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2016 9:28:55 AM
Creation date
5/12/2016 9:25:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
05652
Town
Montrose Township
Section Numbers
1
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-05652
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Petition #5652 <br /> C.U.P. #1070 <br /> Concerns from resident on adjacent property, 1396 Sayles Trail, William G. Luth. <br /> 1 . While zoned an agricultural area in the country, this is a residential area. 3 to <br /> 4 residential sites adjacent to proposed site and 6± more in close proximity. <br /> 2. Safety: Long term effects on residents in close proximity to transmission <br /> towers - i.e. similar to effects now being realized from high voltage power lines. <br /> Effects from "spill over" from method of transmission, i.e. if microwave- similar <br /> to cautions distributed with microwave ovens. <br /> 3. Impact on quality of life and potential financial loss: <br /> • My property is adjacent to proposed site <br /> • My back yard backs up to proposed site <br /> • Focus of house and yard is to back yard: <br /> -Solarium <br /> -Deck <br /> -Landscaping - trees & rock outcroppings <br /> • I would not have purchased property if there had been a large visible <br /> tower behind it. <br /> • Impact on Television and Radio reception <br /> • Why isn't this commercial project being located in a commercial or <br /> industrial setting - high ground means a shorter, less expensive tower is <br /> needed - i.e. commercial venture saves money at expense of neighbors. <br /> SUMMARY: Why consider changing the zoning status of such an area of the <br /> countryside to allow a commercial project which not only doesn't bring <br /> value to the area but poses safety and financial risks to the area <br /> residents. (A zoning change to allow residential expansion would be <br /> understandable and hard to argue against.) <br /> I further plead with this committee to oppose this request as it provides <br /> financial benefit to two parties (seller and communication tower owner), <br /> at the expense of the area residents. This is classic win/lose situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.