1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE HELD ON October 25, 1990 The following members were present: Harvey, Arts, Rendall and Quackenbush Also: Fleck and Reynolds. Meeting called to order at 7:00 P.M. in Room 2E City-County Building by Vice Chair Harvey to hold public hearing as published by Class II Notice. Quackenbush/Rendall to approve minutes of September 27 and October 23, 1990. Motion carried - 4-0. Board bids welcome to new member James Arts. #2043 Appeal by Richard Talaczyk, agent for Ronald Tuscher for a variance from required sideyard minimum lot width and minimum lot area as provided by Section 10.07(4) and (7) to permit substandard lot approval South of 100 Argue Road in the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 - Section 31, Town of Montrose. IN FAVOR: R. Tuscher OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- Quackenbush/Arts to grant variances of 10 feet from required right sideyard, 1216 more or less square feet from requird lot area, also 45 more or less feet from required lot width to permit buildings as exist. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Variances are necessary for certified survey map approval. 2). County line splits property and buildings. 3). Applicant has sufficient yards however for CSM approval not enough lands in Dane County. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Proven case of unnecessary hardship. Motion carried - 4-0. #2045 Appeal by Richard & Susan Albright for a variance from required sideyard and setback from normal high watermark as provided by Sections 10.123(7), 10.05(7) and 11.03(2) to permit deck addition to residence at 940 Brookside Circle being Lot #1, Blk. #8, 1st Addition to Riverwood Estates, Section 17, Town of Dunkirk. IN FAVOR: R. & S. Albright OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Quackenbush/Rendall to grant variance of 22.5 more or less feet from required average setback to normal high water mark also to grant variance of 3 feet 4 inches from required left sideyard to permit deck replacement as constructed. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Deck dimensionally dulicates original deck in need of repair. 2). Property to left of applicant is owned by the township and is park, not to be built upon. 3). Applicant purchased property with original deck in place.