Laserfiche WebLink
2) . Variance is not contrary of rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2445. Appeal by Timothy and Michaleen Neitzel for a variance <br /> from required setback from normal high watermark and <br /> maximum of alterations of a nonconforming struc <br /> ture as provided by Section 11. 03 (2) and 10. 23 (2) to <br /> permit addition to existing single family residence at <br /> 2374 CTH AB - being parts of Lots 10 and 11, Colladay <br /> Park plus additional lands in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 and NW <br /> 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 23 , Town of Dunn. <br /> IN FAVOR: T & M Neitzel, R. Heller OPPOSED: --- <br /> COMMUNICATION: Town Board. <br /> KLOPP/GASKILL To hold request in abeyance until October Hearing <br /> pending an opinion from Dane County Corporation Counsel regarding <br /> Board of Adjustment authority and guidelines under Chapter 10. 21 <br /> and 10. 23 Dane County Code of Ordinances. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2446. Appeal by Douglas J. Haag for a variance from required <br /> setback from road as provided by Section 10. 17 (2) (b) to <br /> permit addition to existing single family residence at <br /> 6190 CTH J - in the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 - being Lot #1, CSM <br /> 5757 - Section 20, Town of Vermont. <br /> IN FAVOR: D. Haag OPPOSED: -- COMMUNICATION: Environmental <br /> Health, Dane County Highway. <br /> DREPS/KLOPP To grant, with conditions, variance of 4 feet from <br /> required setback to right-of-way of CTH J to permit residential <br /> addition as proposed. <br /> CONDITIONS: <br /> 1) . The addition shall be removed at the owner's expense if future <br /> road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> 2) . Subject to compiance with all Environmental Health rules and <br /> regulations. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Almost half of existing structure is within required setback <br /> area. <br /> 2) . Proposed addition will not extend number of bedrooms above #3 . <br /> 3) . Septic system and flood zone in rear yard severely limit <br /> buildable area. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> BOA/MINUTES/9/23/93 <br /> Page 9 <br />