1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA 6/24/93 Minutes Page 6 (Lot #22) - Variance os 2.78 feet from required setback to right-of-way of Karl Avenue to permit residence as constructed. FINDING OF FACT: I ). Lots 13, 14 and 15 were constructed with setback violations due to contractor error. 2). Lot #22 was issued Zoning Permit in error and relied upon that permit thusly setback is in error. 3). Residences make up small subdivision surrounded by Village of Belleville. 4) . The required right-of-way setback within the Village of Belleville is 25 feet versus The 30 feet required by Dane County Zoning. 5) . Residences sold and occupied by individual families. CONCLUSION: I ). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 5-0. #2405 . Appeal by William and Marcia Huemoeller for a variance from required sign distance from intersection and setback from road as provided by Sections 10.78(7) and 10.83(2) to permit on-premise sign as located at 3767 Birch Trail in the SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 23, Town of Cross Plains. IN FAVOR: W. Huemoeller OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: County Highway Gaskill/Dreps to hold request in abeyance not beyond August Hearing to allow applicant to explore options as well as contacting Dane County Highway Department. Motion carried- 5-0. #2406. Appeal by Ken and Elizabeth LePine for a variance from required sideyard as provided by Section 10.07(7) to permit garage addition to existing residence at 3094 Shadyside Drive being Lot #14, Shadyside Park - Section 30, Town of Pleasant Springs. IN FAVOR: K. LePine OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Letters from adjoining owners. Dreps/Gaskill to grant, with condition, variance of 1 more or less foot from required left sideyard to permit residential garage expansion as proposed. CONDITION: I ). Grant being subject to Town Board Approval . FINDING OF FACT: I ). Building line is a continuation of garage granted a variance in October 1975. (#398). 2). Applicant presently has use of single car garage-proposal is to make room for 2 vehicles. 3). Variance needed for minimal incursion of 1 foot at maximum and tapering to zero encroachment. 4) . The advent of public sewer makes this proposal now feasible. CONCLUSION: I ). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried - 5-0.