2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA 4/25/02 PAGE 1 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES OF 4/25/2002 PRESENT: Sayles, Kay, Long and Klopp ALSO: Reynolds Meeting called to order at 6:30 P.M. in Room 2-F City-County Building by Vice Chair Sayles to hold Public Hearing as published by Class II Notice. Minutes: KLOPP/LONG to amend minutes of March 21, 2002, RE: #3171 —to read: ROSS/SAYLES to deny requested variance to right sideyard to permit residential addition as constructed. Motion carried—4-1 (Klopp, no). KAY/LONG to approve minutes of March 14 and March 21, 2002 as amended. Motion carried 4-0 #3182. Appeal by Roman & Sandra Meier for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(1) to permit porch addition to existing residence at 7176 State Highway 113 in the SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 13, Town of Dane. IN FAVOR: S. Meier OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board KAY/SAYLES to grant variance of 18± feet from required setback to centerline of State Highway 113 to permit reconstruction of existing porch and allow expansion Westerly, not to exceed 15 feet from existing residence wall. (Roll call vote) Sayles-aye, Klopp-no, Kay-aye and Long-no. Motion failed. 2-2. KAY/LONG to grant variance of 18± feet from required setback to centerline of State Highway 113 to permit reconstruction of existing porch and allow expansion Westerly, not to exceed 8.5 feet from existing residence wall. Finding of fact: 1). Applicant proposes to rebuild and expand existing enclosed porch which is in need or repair. 2). Proposal is to encroach 7 feet closer to centerline of State Highway 113, requiring a variance of 25 feet. 3). Section 10.17(1)Dane County Code of Ordinance requires minimum required setback from State Trunk Highways to be 100 feet to centerline or 42 feet to right-of- way,whichever is greater. 4). Applicant, has corn crib located closer to centerline than proposed addition will go. 5). Buildable area limited by well, septic system and trees. Conclusion: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. tir Motion carried 4-0.