2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA MINUTES 8/23/01 PAGE 2 (ri. Conclusion: 1). Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried- 5-0. #3147. Appeal by Steven&Nancy Homme for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(3) to permit new deck addition to existing residence at 4740 Goodland Park Road in the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 6, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: S &N Home OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board SAYLES/KLOPP to grant variance of 18.84 feet from required setback to right-of-way of Goodland Park Road to allow entry deck as proposed. Finding of fact: 1). Applicant proposes to replace cement porch of identical dimension with new wood deck. 2). Section 10.16(4)(d) would allow similar deck of 12 feet in width without need for variance. 3). Structure needed a secondary emergency exits and deck must be wider than 12 feet to allow egress from both exits. 4). Structure is an old cheese factory converted to residential use. (ir Conclusion: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried- 5-0. #3148. Appeal by Robert&Victoria Lovely for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(5)to permit garage addition to existing residence at 5276 Scenic Ridge Trail being Lot#24, Prestige Hills Section 29, Town of Springfield. IN FAVOR: R. Lovely OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. KAY/SAYLES to deny requested variance from 30 foot minimum setback to right-of- way of Scenic Ridge Trail to permit garage expansion as proposed. Finding of fact: 1). Applicant proposes to expand existing 2 car garage into 3 stalls and relocate entrance. 2). Lot slopes toward residence and rain and snow accumulate in front of garage door. 3). Applicant has sufficient lot to add 3rd stall without encroaching into required sideyard. 4). Appears alternate design could accomplish desired storage and address run-off concerns. Conclusion: tor 1). Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried 5-0.