Laserfiche WebLink
MICHAELBEST <br /> &FRIEDRICH May 21, 1991 <br /> jai <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1. Description of the Use. We have been advised that Ms. <br /> Newell and Mr. Larson intend to operate an art gallery which <br /> will be engaged in the sale of frames and framing and artwork. <br /> We have also been advised that Ms. Newell and Mr. Larson have <br /> applied for a Class A liquor license, which will permit them to <br /> sell wine and other distilled spirits. (Although Ms. Newell <br /> stated that her intention was to sell only wine and in <br /> connection with the sales of their artwork, there is no <br /> restriction under the zoning code or under the Class A liquor <br /> license that requires such a limitation. Thus, if a business <br /> opportunity existed to sell vintage or collector wines or if <br /> financial pressures required greater sales of wine, nothing <br /> under the zoning law or under the liquor laws would prevent or <br /> restrict increased wine sales. ) We have also been advised that <br /> the art gallery would have business hours of approximately <br /> 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. daily and evening hours during holidays. We <br /> have also been advised that the art gallery would host art shows <br /> with guest artists, presumably to promote the sales of artwork, <br /> framing and other merchandise held for sale. The proposed use <br /> is to be located on the entire lower level (except for the <br /> kitchen) of a large single-family residence that is located on a <br /> five-acre parcel of land presently zoned agricultural A-1. <br /> Arrangements would be made for parking and signage. A copy of <br /> the application, the supporting letter and the survey map are <br /> enclosed for your review. <br /> 2. The Use Does Not Qualify as a Limited Family <br /> Business. We have reviewed the relatively newly enacted <br /> § 10. 192 of the Dane County Ordinances (which provides for <br /> Limited Family Businesses) and have concluded that the uses <br /> contemplated by this application would be inappropriate under <br /> the provisions and stated purposes of that section. In support <br /> of that conclusion, we submit the following: <br /> A. Section 10. 192 (2) provides: <br /> " (2) A conditional use permit for a limited family <br /> business is designed to accommodate small family businesses <br /> without the necessity for relocation or rezoning while at <br /> the same time protecting the interests of adjacent property <br /> owners. " (Emphasis added. ) <br /> The language contained in the ordinance strongly suggests that <br /> it was intended to accommodate a second family income by <br /> permitting a limited business enterprise to be engaged in within <br /> the confines of an existing family residence. Thus, the family <br /> would not be required to relocate or to seek rezoning. The <br /> proposed use, which is a separate and freestanding use, is not <br />