TIE 40510070020 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. None (f)Was the corner restored through acceptance of(1) an obliterated evidence location, or(2)a found perpetuated location? A found perpetuated location. (gbh)Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? Not Applicable. (i) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types set or found,surveyor, and date of survey. February 9, 1984 -George Weir reestablished the corner based on proportionate methods between the SW corner of Section 7 and the SE corner of Section 7 in proporation with the measurements of the old government field notes. The corner was not monumented because it lies in the middle of a currently farmed field and would probably be destroyed during farming. Ties are shown to both corners used to establish the location. August 6, 1986 - Roger Schneeberger reestablished the corner by proportionate measurement between the NW corner of Section 18 and the NE corner of Section 18 in proportion with the measurements of the old government field notes. A Dane County aluminum monument was set 18" below grade and reference monuments were set. (j) I, Kevin C. Lord Affix Land Surveyor Seal hereby, certify that the corner location shown on this record was determined by me or under my . • ' ' ' ' , direction and correct and that this U.S. Public • tc3 •.C O NSA •,• Land Survey Monument Record is correct .• 4/i • complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. KEVIN C. •• LORD . . S-2645 • * • MADISON, • WIS. SuR� • ��. Signature Date