|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2009-00551
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2000s
>
2009
>
DCPZP-2009-00551
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2016 12:58:26 PM
Creation date
7/8/2016 3:43:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2009-00551
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dane County Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 9 of 13 <br /> May 28.2009 <br /> access to the new building. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1. Unnecessary Hardship: The Dane County Sign Ordinance does not provide for signage in <br /> urbanized areas. The variances support the stated purposes of the Sign Ordinance regarding <br /> public safety and the character of the community. <br /> 2. Unique Limitations of the Property: The lot configuration is similar to that of a corner lot, which <br /> would allow three signs. The third sign serves a different purpose than a standard wall sign, and <br /> is not visible from a road. <br /> 3. No Harm to Public Interests: Providing for improved visibility by increasing sign height serves <br /> public safety by allowing easier identification and access by motorists. The variances to sign <br /> height and number of signs are offset by the aggregate area of the three signs, which is 62% of <br /> the available total allowable area of 200 square feet for two permitted wall signs. The signs meet <br /> the standards of the City of Fitchburg, which will annex this area in the future. <br /> Motion carried: 4— 1 (Long: No). <br /> 6. Appeal 3566 by Christopher Bukrey for a variance from setback from road as provided by Section <br /> 10.17(3), Dane County Code of Ordinances, to permit addition to existing single-family residence as <br /> proposed at 1175 Dunkirk Avenue in part of the NW 1/4 SW 1/4, Section 9, Town of Dunkirk. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS: <br /> 05/13/2009: Town of Dunkirk Planning Commission motion to "recommend to the Town Board <br /> approval of the variance, since the addition will increase the value and longevity of the home and <br /> does not encroach further [into the setback from right-of-way]" was carried unanimously. <br /> 05/18/2009: Town of Dunkirk Board approved appeal unanimously. <br /> 05/26/2009: Email from Pam Dunphy, Assistant Dane County Highway Commissioner: "This section <br /> of Dunkirk Avenue has not been a County Road since 1990." <br /> VARIANCE REQUESTED: Purpose: Covered porch addition to an existing single-family residence, <br /> which is the only part of a two-story addition to the existing house that would encroach into the <br /> setback from right-of-way. <br /> Setback from Road Variance: <br /> Minimum setback from right-of-way (ROW) required: 63 feet from centerline or 30 feet <br /> from ROW line (same location) <br /> Proposed setback from ROW: 27.7 feet. <br /> VARIANCE NEEDED: 2.3 feet <br /> IN FAVOR: Sarah Bukrey, Stoughton, WI <br /> ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT: AZA Schutte reported that Zoning Administrator Roger <br /> Lane had no objection or recommendation regarding this appeal. <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> Motion: Hamre/Reynolds to grant variance of 2.3 feet from the required minimum 30 feet setback <br /> from the right-of-way of Dunkirk Avenue to allow covered porch addition to single-family residence, <br /> being the only part of a two-story addition to the existing house that would encroach into the setback <br /> from right-of-way, as proposed. <br /> Finding of Fact: <br /> 1. The owners' unplatted R-2 Residential lot is located in the Shoreland district (within 300 feet of the <br /> Floodplain line) of the Yahara River. With 0.875 acres (38,115 SF) and 150 feet of lot width at the <br /> Dunkirk Avenue right-of-way, it complies with Shoreland district standards. <br /> 2. The existing 22 feet x 26 feet two-story house is more than 100 years old, according to the owner. <br /> 3. The Bukreys wish to add a 14 foot x 18 foot two-story wing to the north side of the house: A) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.