Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing: January 26, 2016 Petition: Rezone 10931 <br /> Staff Report Zoning Amendment: Town/sect: <br /> A-1 EX Exclusive Agriculture Pleasant Springs <br /> District to R-1A Residence Section 11 <br /> Agriculture <br /> Acres:2.9 Applicant <br /> Zoning and Land Regulation Committee Survey Req. Yes Stephen D Champagne <br /> Reason. <br /> Creating two residential lots Location: <br /> 2059 Rinden Road <br /> A-1(EX) A-1(EX) <br /> ED V Q <br /> RH-1 <br /> C3°0 <br /> Rinden Rd <br /> Nit E,,(jec' <br /> To A-2(1) <br /> 4)D•PREZ- 1 10171 `\ <br /> . <br /> A 2 <br /> - RH 2 <br /> r ,rr• - <br /> RH-1 <br /> •4 <br /> FtHA <br /> A-1(EX) <br /> DESCRIPTION: The petitioner would like to separate the existing structures from the 75-acre property. The proposal is <br /> to create two residential lots. <br /> OBSERVATIONS: Several inconsistencies were discovered as part of reviewing this particular property. The zoning <br /> records show that several buildings were constructed under the auspice of being accessory buildings or garages. After <br /> the shells of the buildings were constructed, the buildings were converted into additional residences. Currently, it <br /> appears that there are three single-family residences on the property, two of which do not have Town/County <br /> approvals. <br /> In 1993, the most southerly building was constructed on the property as a garage. In 1996, this building was converted <br /> into a secondary farm residence contrary to the Town's and County's approval. The permit for the conversion was <br /> rescinded due to the owner not making substantial farm income. It appears that this building is this in violation of <br /> county ordinances. <br /> In 2006, another two-story structure was constructed on the property without a Dane County Zoning Permit. A stop <br /> work order was issued for the construction, but the landowner claimed that the building was a farm building used to <br /> store farm implements. To resolve the dispute, the landowner signed an affidavit in 2008, stating that the building <br /> would only be used for the storage of farm implements. An inspection of the building this month revealed that the <br /> building was converted into another secondary residence. See attached inspection report. It appears that this building is <br /> in violation of county ordinances as well. <br /> Continued... <br />