|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2009-00073
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2000s
>
2009
>
DCPZP-2009-00073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 3:51:52 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 1:27:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2009-00073
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Krell Property Wetland Determination and Delineation <br /> November 15,2005 Town of Verona,Dane County,Wisconsin <br /> NRC Project#05-260 <br /> At each observation point: <br /> 1. The presence or absence of normal circumstances was determined. <br /> 2. The plant community was characterized by identifying dominant plant species using the"50/20"rule. <br /> For each stratum in the plant community,dominant species are the most abundant(when ranked in <br /> descending order of abundance and cumulatively totaled)that immediately exceed 50%of the total <br /> dominance measure for the stratum,plus any additional species comprising 20%or more of the total <br /> dominance measure for the stratum. <br /> Wetland indicatotrlstatus is ranked by percent probability of the species occurrence in wetlands as <br /> follows: <br /> • OBL=Obligate Wetland,occurs with an estimated 99 percent probability of occurrence in • <br /> wetlands <br /> FACW=Facultative Wetland,l,estimated 67 to 99 percent probability of occurrence in <br /> wetlands <br /> • FAC=Facultative equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands(34 to 66 percent <br /> probability) <br /> • FACU=Facultative upland, 67 7 to 99 percent probability in non-wetlands, 1 to 33 percent in <br /> wetlands <br /> • UPL=Obligate Upland,greater than 99 percent probability in non-wetlands in this region <br /> • NI=No indicator,insufficient information available to determine an indicator status <br /> Wetland indicator status can be modified with a positive sign(+)to indicate a frequency toward the <br /> higher end of the category,while a min sign(-)indicates a frequency toward the lower end of the <br /> category(Resource Management Groin, 1995); <br /> 3. Soil pits were dug to a depth of at least)18 inches when possible and the soil was evaluated for hydric <br /> soil characteristics;and <br /> 4. Hydrology was assessed by observing for primary(i.e.,inundation,saturation within the root zone, <br /> water marks,etc.)and secondary(i.e.,oxidized pore linings,water stained leaves,etc.)indicators of <br /> wetland hydrology. <br /> The transects were initiated at a representa 've location within each wetland to first complete the wetland <br /> determination. The uppermost wetland bo dary was identified once an upland site was encountered <br /> along the transect. The uppermost wetland boundary was flagged using consecutively numbered <br /> surveyors flagging and mapped with Glo Positioning System(GPS)equipment. Subject to weathering, <br /> the flagging will remain in the field for use during a USACE/WDNR site visit and for a guide during <br /> construction. <br /> Natural Resources Consulting,/me. Page 4 <br /> Specializing in wetland,biological and environmental permitting services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.