Laserfiche WebLink
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished <br /> and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show <br /> the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> None <br /> (f)Was the corner restored through acceptance of(1) an obliterated evidence location, or(2)a found <br /> perpetuated location? <br /> A found perpetuated location. <br /> (g&h)Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including <br /> the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for <br /> proportioning in determining the corner location? <br /> Not Applicable. <br /> (i) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including <br /> monument types set or found, surveyor, and date of survey. <br /> Not Dated -An unnamed tie sheet shows a railroad spike at the Southeast corner of Section 31 and also a <br /> railroad spike at the Northeast corner of Section 6, Porter Township, Rock County being 66'east of the <br /> Southeast corner of Section 31. <br /> April 27, 2010- Donald Barnes notes a monument was not found for the Southeast corner of Section 31 <br /> however accepted the aluminum monument at the Northeast corner of Section 6, Porter Township, Rock <br /> County. <br /> Q) I, Kevin C. Lord Affix Land Surveyor Seal <br /> hereby, certify that the corner location shown on <br /> this record was determined by me or under my ' ' • <br /> direction and correct and that this U.S. Public .l '�g C O N, , <br /> Land Survey Monument Record is correct .' y� ,.•••••• , <br /> • <br /> complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. - <br /> KEVIN C. • <br /> LORD <br /> * S-2645 * <br /> - MADISON, - <br /> ... <br /> • •• WIS. •'0 • <br /> SUR <br /> Signature Date <br />