Laserfiche WebLink
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished <br /> and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show <br /> the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> A discrepancy was found comparing the distance along the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20 between Plat of <br /> Survey No. 2004-00668, Plat of Survey No. 2006-01238, and CSM No. 12450 all completed by Glen Northrop. <br /> A monument was found (however bent) near the location as shown on CSM No. 12450 and the survey spike <br /> was set in the position as shown on this CSM. <br /> (f)Was the corner restored through acceptance of(1) an obliterated evidence location, or(2)a found <br /> perpetuated location? <br /> A found perpetuated location. <br /> (gbh)Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including <br /> the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for <br /> proportioning in determining the corner location? <br /> Not Applicable. <br /> (i) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including <br /> monument types set or found, surveyor, and date of survey. <br /> No Date-An unnamed tie sheet shows the point on the centerline on STH 138 and references fieldbook 426, <br /> page 19. <br /> (j) I, Kevin C. Lord Affix Land Surveyor Seal <br /> hereby, certify that the corner location shown on <br /> this record was determined by me or under my • , , <br /> direction and correct and that this U.S. Public ••• ♦5 C NS <br /> Land Survey Monument Record is correct . /�•• <br /> complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. •• <br /> KEVIN C. • <br /> * • LORD• <br /> • • S-2645 * • <br /> MADISON, <br /> WIS. • • <br /> •Signature Date <br />