|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2009-00273
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2000s
>
2009
>
DCPZP-2009-00273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2016 1:13:48 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 1:13:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2009-00273
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dane County Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 5 of 7 <br /> February 26,2009 <br /> required. Micetic explained that the requested variance would reduce land-disturbing construction <br /> activities and driveway paving. <br /> 8. Current lot coverage is 25.7%; proposed lot coverage is 29.96%, less than the maximum <br /> permitted 30%. An existing deck on the lake side would not be changed. <br /> 9. Micetic told the Board that the Pleasant Springs Plan Commission meeting at which this variance <br /> would be considered was scheduled on March 11, 2009 and the Town Board meeting would be <br /> March 17, 2009. She explained that the garage construction was planned immediately, while the <br /> house remodeling is planned for this fall. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1) Unnecessary Hardship: It would be unnecessarily burdensome to prevent improvements based <br /> on the footprint of the existing home to allow continued residential use of this property. Granting <br /> the variances balances the rights of the property owner with the purposes of Shoreland zoning. <br /> 2) Unique Limitations of the Property: Zoning permit records for the residence and garage reveal <br /> existing nonconformities, differing past interpretations of Zoning Ordinance regulations and <br /> varying levels of enforcement in the past for this challenging lot. <br /> 3) No Harm to Public Interests: Even with multiple variances, the proposal achieves more <br /> compliance and minimizes need for relief. The setback from road right-of-way would be <br /> increased. <br /> Motion carried, with Condition: 5— 0. <br /> Chair Schulz told Micetic that she would be allowed to return for reconsideration if the Town of <br /> Pleasant Springs does not approve the variance. <br /> IV. APPEALS FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS <br /> 1. Appeal 3519. From the 02-28-2008 Public Hearing: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF ONE- <br /> YEAR DEADLINE FOR ZONING PERMIT: Appeal by James Borling (Chris Neumann, Shaw Building <br /> & Design, Inc., agent) for variances from minimum required setback from a delineated Wetlands <br /> boundary and minimum required side yard as provided by Sections 11.06(5), 10.123(7) and 10.05(7), <br /> Dane County Code of Ordinances, to permit proposed construction of new single-family residence <br /> south of 2043 River Estates Lane in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 29, Town of Pleasant Springs. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS: 01/30/2009— Letter from Jim Borling requesting one-year extension of <br /> deadline for zoning permit for proposed new house. <br /> IN FAVOR: None <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> ZONING ADMINSTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION: None. <br /> Finding of Fact: <br /> 1. Borling's property is zoned A-1 EX Agriculture Exclusive (non-conforming parcel size, residential <br /> use only); also part Shoreland, Floodplain and Wetland. Board action at the 02-28-2008 meeting: <br /> Motion: Reynolds/Studz to grant variance of 25 feet from the minimum 75 foot setback from <br /> Wetlands with a Condition that Borling combine the two parcels, thus eliminating the need for the <br /> side yard variance. Motion carried: 3 — 1 (Long) <br /> 2. Boding combined the two parcels into one with CSM 12518, recorded August 15, 2008. <br /> 3. One-year deadline for obtaining a zoning permit for a new house would be 02-28-2009. <br /> 4. Boding remained in contact with Zoning staff throughout 2008 and confirmed the deadline for <br /> obtaining a Zoning Permit. When it became apparent that his plans to build would take longer <br /> than one year to initiate, he contacted staff about the process for obtaining an extension. <br /> 5. Section 10.26(9) DCCO: Expiration of authorization: <br /> "When any construction shall have been authorized by the Board of Adjustment..., a permit for <br /> such construction shall be taken out within one year from the date of such authorization [the <br /> variance], otherwise such authorization shall become null and void; provided that the Board of <br /> adjustment, upon request, may extend such authorization for a specific period of time without <br /> the necessity another public hearing." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.