Laserfiche WebLink
- 8 - , <br /> EXTRATERRITORIAL ZONING <br /> What is extraterritorial zoning? <br /> Extraterritorial zoning is authorized by s.62.23 (7a) which permits cities <br /> and villages to zone land outside their municipal borders. The municipal- <br /> ity may unilaterally adopt zoning which freezes the zoning or uses in the <br /> surrounding town for up to two years, while a comprehensive zoning plan <br /> is being prepared. If the municipality is to make the zoning permanent, <br /> it must be approved by a six-member committee composed of three town and <br /> three municipal representatives. <br /> What has the court said about extraterritorial zoning? <br /> In Walworth County v. Elkhorn (1965) 27 Wis. 2d 30, 133 N.W.2d 257 the <br /> court upheld the validity of the statute and its application to an interim <br /> freeze of existing agricultural zoning in the town which prohibited a <br /> liquor store although the town and county subsequently amended the zoning <br /> to permit such use. In Town of Grand Chute v. City pf Appleton (Ct. App. <br /> 1979) 91 Wis. 2d 293, 282 N.Wrd 629, the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin <br /> ruled that an interim extraterritorial ordinance allows (1 ) interim zoning <br /> freezes if there is zoning and (2) interim use freezes if there is no <br /> zoning. It does not allow the municipality to freeze the more restrictive <br /> of the zoning or uses. A 1974 Opinion of the Attorney General 730 AG 69 <br /> says that municipal extraterritorial zoning does not supersede county <br /> shoreland zoning, but is also effective insofar as it is consistent with, <br /> or more restrictive than, county shoreland zoning. <br /> (SEE NEXT PAGE) What does s . 62.23(7a) say? <br /> How has this statute been interpreted? <br /> In a 1978 opinion, 670 AG 238, the Attorney General addressed a number of <br /> issues involving 62.23(7a): (1 ) a "land use survey" is not required prior <br /> to adopting an interim ordinance although a land use survey probably would <br /> be part of the comprehensive plan upon which the final extraterritorial <br /> zoning ordinance would be based; (2) s.62.23(7a)(b) permits the governing <br /> body to amend the districts and regulations of the interim ordinance but <br /> amendments should not be of a nature that would later compromise the com- <br /> prehensive plan; (3) the procedure for amending both the interim and the <br /> final extraterritorial ordinance requires a prior favorable vote of a <br /> majority of the 6 member extraterritorial committee before the governing <br /> body may adopt the amendment. The joint committee and the governing body <br /> must hold a public hearing and give notice as provided in s.62.23(7a)(c) <br /> and (e). Thus, the joint committee must stay in existence after the final <br /> extraterritorial zoning ordinance has been adopted; and (4) The administra- <br /> tion and enforcement of the interim and final extraterritorial zoning <br /> ordinance is by the city or village. The city or village board of zoning <br /> appeals handles all administrative appeals from interpretation or implemen- <br /> tation of the ordinance. <br /> What other extraterritorial land use control jurisdiction do cities <br /> and villages have? <br /> 5.236.02(2) and s.236.10(1 )(b) give extraterritorial plat approval within <br /> 3 miles of the corporate limits of a 1st, 2nd or 3rd class city or 1-1/2 <br /> miles of a 4th class city or village if the municipality adopts a sub- <br /> division ordinance or an official map. ' <br />