DCPCUP-0000-00715 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • " 9 • , • � r + You should also be aware that the Town Board is in much trouble with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources concoring their activitins at this site. 1. On 2/25/86, by a letter to the Town Chairman, The DNR revoked the Towns Open Burning Permit. At a Town meeting much later, the rest of the Town Board didn't even know the permit had been revoked. 2. On 6/16/86, the DNR directed the Town to remove a large illegal pile of "brush", "debris" and "trash". The Town has ignored the DNR order; The pile is still there and the DNR has recently issued a "notice of non-compliance" to the Town conerning this violation. 3. The Town has been- aceepting.burnables for the last 6 months in direct conflict with the DNR's letters and phone calls forbidding it. They have reopened the landfill and are accepting deposits and are not covering them within the time allotted. Now another complaint filed with the DNR. On October 14, 1985 your Zoning Administrator wrote to the Town, "The A.E.L.R. Committee has therefore requested me to ask you to define your proposed use e.g. intent and purpose, operation, etc. . The Committee will be meeting on October 22, 1985 and would appreciate your response by that time if possible. Thank you" . On December 16, 1985, we submitted a series of written questions to the Town Board and subsequent to that date the Town replied in writing; "The Board has received no request for details of the intended use of this parcel from the Dane County Zoning Committee". I mention some of the above items only to point out the Town Boards lack of knowledge of important communications and their habitual non-compliance with legal directives. Not only is there a total disregard on the Towns behalf for listening to its citizens but they are breaking laws daily that protect those same citizens. I have to suggest the strong probability that the Town Board didn't think it too important to comply with your committee's C.U.P. conditions. After all, they didn't recognize the DNR's revocation of their burning permit; they didn't pay any attention to the DNR's order to remove the trash pile and they didn't know your committee asked them to define the proposed intent, purpose and operation of this site; So why should they worry about meeting the conditions of the C.U.P. . I suggest that the C.U.P. was granted with certain conditions and that the Towns compliance with these conditions are an absolute requirement for their retain- ing the C.U.P. . The conditions are as much a part of the C.U.P. as the conditional use itself. If the door is opened for the changing of the conditions, then I think the door should be opened all the way to allow reconsideration of the entire matter. We ask that you reconsider your action of 9/24/86 and resolve to retain and enforce the original conditions of the C.U.P. . If I or any of the other residents of the Natvig Road community can be of any service to you or your committee we would be happy to do so. Sincerely, Al elt