Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Dane County Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 12 of 16 <br /> September 25,2008 <br /> existing site for many years, with a number of buildings and storage yards. One building on <br /> Proposed Lot 10 of the Novation Campus I I plat will extend into the ROW of proposed Venture <br /> Street. The lease for this use is in place through Spring 2009. Henshue Construction will be <br /> involved in infrastructure development of the Novation Campus II plat area, so maintaining this <br /> use in the proposed C-1 area results in energy efficiency. NOTE: The non-complying location of <br /> the Henshue building in relation to the existing west property line/side yard is "grandfathered;" no <br /> variance is needed unless the building is expanded in that direction or unless more than 50% of <br /> the building is damaged or altered. <br /> 9. C) An existing house and detached garage and sheds located on Proposed Lot 9 must remain <br /> due to a "life estate" agreement with the owner, Mr. Schwengel, who has lived there 42 years. <br /> The Alexander Company was granted CUP 2076 on 08/26/2009 to allow the single-family <br /> residential use in the new C-1 district. The house and detached garage and at least one shed all <br /> encroach into the rights-of-way of proposed Synergy Street and/or the expanded ROW of County <br /> Highway MM/Rimrock Road. Some smaller outbuildings may be moved or removed to eliminate <br /> encroachment and the need for variances. The vision triangle encroachment will be ameliorated <br /> by the traffic signal proposed for this intersection, according to the agent. <br /> 10. The Board of Adjustment may not grant variances within any road right-of-way. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1. Unnecessary Hardship: Conformity with the restrictions of the Zoning Ordinance as they exist <br /> would be unnecessarily burdensome in light of inter-governmental development processes and <br /> standard transportation planning practices necessary to develop the proposed plat. <br /> 2. Unique Limitations of the Property: The multiple governmental jurisdictions with interests in this <br /> property, and the developer's intent to mitigate its status as a brownfield site present unique <br /> conditions specific to all three locations described in the Appeal. <br /> 3. No Harm to Public Interests: The proposed variances will allow desirable urban infill and are in <br /> the public interest, improving environmental conditions and transportation routing, and promoting <br /> workplace and community development. <br /> Motion carried: 4 —0 on a roll call vote. (Note: Board member Hamre had left the meeting.) <br /> IV. APPEAL RETURNING FROM PREVIOUS HEARING <br /> 1. Appeal 3537, returning from the August 28, 2008 Board of Adjustment Public Hearing: <br /> Appeal by John & Monica Quale for variances from A) minimum required lot width at the building <br /> setback line, B) minimum required lot area, C) maximum allowable lot coverage, D) minimum <br /> required setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark, E) minimum rear yard setback for an <br /> accessory building, and F) minimum required setback from road as provided by Sections 11.03(1) <br /> & (2), 10.05(4) & (5) and 10.17(4) or (5), and 10.16(6), Dane County Code of Ordinances, to <br /> permit additions and alterations to existing single-family residence on an existing substandard lot <br /> in the Shoreland District at 2004 Barber Drive, being Lot 17, Richards Standish Replat of Crown <br /> Point and adjoining land in the SE 1/4 NW 1/4, Section 26, Town of Dunn. <br /> Action of the Board at the 08/28/2008 Board of Adjustment Public Hearing: Motion Schulz/Long to <br /> abey up to 60 days to allow the Quales to reduce the need for variances and improve their <br /> alternatives analysis and explanation of hardships. Carried: 3 -- 0. Members of the Board asked <br /> Schutte to provide a comparison of existing and proposed impervious surfaces on-the Lynn property, <br /> and to verify the required setback from right-of-way. They asked Quale to address the three hardship <br /> questions and alternatives analysis, including why a two-car garage is needed. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS, as presented at the 09/28/2008 Public Hearing: <br /> 08/25/2008: Dunn Town Board "recommends approval...conditioned upon them keeping the surface <br /> water runoff generated on this property from going onto the adjacent properties." Town Clerk <br /> Rosalind Gausman reported that the Quales submitted letters of support from their neighbors. <br /> 08/19/2008: Letter from Cami Peterson, Water Regulation and Zoning Specialist, WDNR, <br /> recommending denial of the variances. Chair Schulz asked Schutte to read the letter into the record. <br />