DCPCUP-0000-00506 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' • X I would, however, agree to abide b y the following criteria concerning the use ': f the strip by others: 1) Any user would be screened by me (the owner) . 2) I would never allow more than six other aircraft at any one time to use the airstrip. 3) Student training or practicing would not be permitted by invitees. 4) Anyone who abuses the privilege of using the airstrip would be denied any future use. Since I maintain a personal responsibility operations to b<'_ conducted at the n the flight • ,..._ -i i!.:)y I c"I�:?r.not want uninvited"d .:;..ir::::raft o;' unsafe I f;i fi 1. 7. [:',I i t: activities'!:7. �i 7. t 7. t:.,r.: :1.I'1 V more . than i;}-,,.-. F'i:'Shl1. .�.,,,,_ act -. _ Ashley s.. T r_, t i n any t h - manner Y. . . be irresponsible and would open one up to unlimited liability. For that reason I have additionally requested that the State of Wis'=onsin and Federal Aviation Administration riot ub l i sh location of p on e._.._ P_.__.._._..._..._....._. the l��cati„rl •.f the alrstri �'rl aithler the State or federal aeronautical charts to prevent unwanted pilots from utilizing the airstrip. ITEM :I:! Thi. -rl..Iit:i. ,-,rlt 1. t.. r.. terr;,i_t: !'!: . I%. i:.^.L 11'1 .1.l �. r-7 - _. _._--•-- _----_..__ ..._.....- !'1...L...I. l:! c::f.:. 1 : rY transfer "a I.;' 7, � I Y'r..iIYI its �-'r..�.....----...-r..-..- - .._.1_ _L....__ ..��:r_�'zr�-__ hie The e Feder a]. Aviation Administration all applications. 'for airspace use“ These a .. ... air i rights .h.. ... � Ashley' s new owner , and._: ..}1._ t ... I .-i .. cannot agree request . The current location 1on :':f the airstrip is ideal , and there are no intentions on moving it . i I would agree to limit the use of the airstrip to priyate non—corlimer_c.i.al_ activities and this restriction would ld then I transfer accordingly to a new owner. Al ]ITEM ttC r (.r r 1- _. r t .,,l y.. ;:s w i.. .'.. .. _ ..}--•i cijr_..._..__ and .:al ! ! !1 r 1 <.. It 1 :i. t r": w;.-.r t ':"a If ; i abide r proposed restriction 1 ti he in t a , t . ai Aviation rIii I r t . ' 1 ": t. addresses 1 ir . . _ . " air. Landing or taking off with a - _ 10 less or . : acceptable h :h - FAA, but anything In _ . _:. of 10 1 hts. s n o t , Although 1 intend to make .:?..I. .!. approaches f r o m, the west , and takeoffs from i ti east as requested the Ashleys, there could be - ' >L < r ' : ; r} ^ , e this might not be possible. Also,, r;}1'_v,_t1i:i :f. lengthen the runway at 8orite future date, landings p in l (1;"1't`'t:I.c I_t.I.i%r would not r;;}'!; )r'i.c!e problem. I might add also that I _h t__: neither flight directly paths t r _ n tht west nor from the ea_ ! are buildings. When wind conditions dictate, whether I a n, landing <::1 t: my y