DCPREZ-0000-04059 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• 67-A=7 frs �- vim'✓ ROY B. HOVEL � ' ` "f ATTORNEYAT LAW )410%1,/ 235 E.MAIN ST.-P.O. Box 43 SUN PRAIRIE.WIS. 53590 November 6, 1987 Mr. William Fleck Zoning Administrator Z. , p— — Rm. 116, City-County Building uM�Nr Madison, WI 53709 Dear Mr. Fleck: As you requested following our telephone conference we had on this date, I enclose herewith a copy of the letter dated October 7, 1987 sent by Norbert Schribner, Authorized Representative of the Dane County Agricultural, Envirnment and Land Records Committee with the address of Room 116, City-County Building, Madison, WI 53709, which specifically indicates "Zoning Petition #4059 has been approved by the Dane County Board of Supervisors. " Although there are several other specified conditions mentioned as requirements for the proposed Certified Survey Map, there was no mention in that letter of a requirement for a "deed restriction" which would prohibit outside storage. Obviously the county zoning classification of C-1 , would cover that matter. For your information I also enclose a copy of a letter I sent to Attorney Gary Hebl after he sent me the request for my client, after having completed the purchase of the land, to impose a deed restriction thereon. Giving further thought to what transpired in our joint telephone conference on this matter on this date, among the things which Mrs. Jensen, the Clerk for the Town of Burke, indicated was the fact that the town wanted the deed restriction for the purpose of having the prohibition against outside storage remain after the rezoning is effected in case of the sale of the lands by Mr. Kesselhon in the future. She was not concerned about Mr. Kesselhon' s use of the premises for his antique business, and Mr. Kesselhon has no objection to the zoning restriction of that nature. Therefore, although I have not discussed this matter with my client as yet, if he should be willing to sign a "deed restriction" if properly worded, I am asking if there would be any objection on the part of the county as well as the Town of Burke if two amendments were made to the deed restriction, as follows: 1 ) That instead of the words contained in paragraph number two, that the paragraph be restated to read as follows: -a; NOV 09 1981, RECEIVED ZONING OIV.