|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-04059
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-04059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 4:08:05 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 4:07:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
05059
Town
Burke Township
Section Numbers
11
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-04059
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br /> ordinances. The latter would include "zoning restrictions" , but <br /> not a requirement to have the purchaser impose a "deed <br /> restriction. " <br /> 2 ) The transaction was fully completed at the closing on <br /> October 27, 1987 which was handled by Hexagon Title Company, Inc. <br /> as an agent for the lender to Kesselhon, Bache Funding of <br /> Wisconsin. The lender as of that date had a mortgage lien on the <br /> lands involved. Any deed restriction would need to have a release <br /> or other appropriate consent to the imposition thereof given by <br /> the mortgage lender in order to be effective. <br /> 3 ) The legal description in the requested restriction is <br /> by metes and bounds rather than by reference to the Certified <br /> Survey which is of record and which is the only appropriate and <br /> proper method of describing the land under the subdivision <br /> ordinance of the County of Dane and the laws of the State of <br /> Wisconsin, with the proper exceptions being taken out of the whole <br /> parcel for the unaffected portions thereof. <br /> 4 ) The restriction "outside storage is not permitted. " is <br /> entirely too vague to be enforceable and is therefore <br /> unconstitutional. <br /> 5 ) If a deed restriction in the nature of that being <br /> requested is being compelled by a governmental authority to be <br /> given by the land owner, then under the Constitution of the United <br /> States and of this state the land owner is entitled to <br /> compensation for damages for a taking of an interest in his lands. <br /> This requires the proper notices in a condemnation procedure. <br /> A land owner can not be voluntarily compelled to give a deed <br /> restriction depriving him of a right in his land without just and <br /> due compensation. <br /> 6 ) There is also a question of the propriety of governmental <br /> units having permitted such land uses in the past and then, after <br /> a purchaser has acquired his property, selectively attempting to <br /> require him to limit his use of the lands he purchased. Although, <br /> Mr. Kesselhon does not intend to permanently store personal <br /> property on these lands , it is a matter of principle, as well as <br /> fairness, in applying the force of governmental regulation. <br /> 7 ) If such deed restriction is being required to be signed <br /> by Mr. Kesselhon at this time, it would be a failure of the seller <br /> to perform her obligations to the purchaser and would place the <br /> purchaser in the position of being able to claim a recission of <br /> this sale because of a failure of a condition thereof and <br /> reimbursement of the damages he had incurred. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.