|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-04196
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-04196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2017 1:22:40 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 1:22:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
04196
Town
Christiana Township
Section Numbers
10
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-04196
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o aM� p o AIDS C MLENOAQUJD J County of Dane <br /> QO � 0 / <br /> DATE: <br /> May 4, 1988 <br /> TO: <br /> Agriculture, Environment & Land <br /> Records Committee <br /> FROM: <br /> William Fleck, <br /> Zoning Administrator <br /> SUBJECT: <br /> Zoning Petition #4196 - Christiana - (see County Board referrals). <br /> This petition was a request for change from A-1 Ex. Agriculture to R-4 Residential . <br /> multi-family in order to provide zoning compliance for an already constructed 3rd floor <br /> apartment addition. You approved the rezone subject to conditions and deed restriction <br /> limiting the use. <br /> I had a problem trying to include the requirement that the construction be brought <br /> up-to-code, as a conditional zoning, it just doesn't fit the intent of that provision of <br /> the Zoning Ordinance as it is currently written. I included the up-to-code requirement <br /> as a deed restriction to facilitate Committee action but, that is not really appropriate <br /> either. <br /> I checked with the State for clarification of what might be required to bring the <br /> construction up-to-code and it was evident that there were several critical areas of <br /> compliance with multi-family plumbing, hearing, electrical etc. ,. The State advised <br /> that compliance might be cost prohibitive. Septic compliance is an additional factor. <br /> Therefore, I suggest that the petition be re-referred to Committee and that you hold <br /> action pending State approval of the preliminary building plans for the multi-family <br /> residence. The preliminary plans can be submitted at nominal cost and will provide the <br /> applicant with the necessary information on cost to decide if he will proceed with <br /> compliance. If he does not decide to proceed the zoning petition could be denied. <br /> CC: Gene Rankin, Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.