DCPVAR-0000-02812 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

investment protected in Trager and Schroedel and falls squarely within their holdings and policy purpose. TO PREVENT WASTE & UNFAIRNESS, THE "USE" PROTECTED IS THE 169 LOTS, SITES OR PADS In a similar case a municipality sought the removal of a mobile home from a lot because a newly enacted ordinance required all mobile homes to be located only within a licensed mobile home park. The Wisconsin Supreme Court held: "The October 19, 1949, ordinance contained no savings clause exempting existing nonconforming uses. If the ordinance in the instant case were to be construed as being retrospective in operation, it would be unconstitutional and invalid with respect to plaintiff's vested interest in his trailer and the right to continue to use the same on his own land for dwelling house purposes." Des Jardin, supra, 53 N.W.2d 784 at 786 (1952) . In another case a developer purchased a parcel of land and commenced the installation of valuable improvements to define lots, sites or pads for a mobile home park on property where the use was permitted under county zoning. While the work was being done, the county zoning ordinance was changed to prohibit the use. For the purpose of discovering the "use" protected by the nonconforming use statute, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held the focus was on the park as a whole and the owner's investment in the improvements necessary to define lots, sites or pads. "At the time of its effective date the plaintiffs had already purchased the property and improved it for use as a trailer camp. These improvements consisted of drilling a well, installing sewers and electricity, constructing a utility building with laundry facilities, construction of a 30 foot wide gravel road and other matters necessary to the operation of a trailer camp or park. These improvements were sufficient to accommodate 40 trailers 10