Laserfiche WebLink
PH JAN 1 3 1987 /TEM NO °21I <br /> PET/T/ON C.U.P. NO. <br /> E.H.D. <br /> 3860 We will object to this petition. We have not had soils data <br /> submitted for review. <br /> CO HWY. <br /> Petition 3860 . We have discussed this subdivision with the <br /> engineering staffs of the State and City, and with <br /> representatives of Menards . We have significant concerns <br /> relative to the location of the present access and the <br /> ability of CTH "S" to handle the additional traffic load <br /> without improvements . The present access was approved by the <br /> Wisconsin Department of Transportation in conjunction with <br /> the old improvements to the West Beltline . The existing <br /> access is located too close to the Beltline ramps and should <br /> — be relocated to the west or to "M" to a point south of the <br /> West Side Businessman's Club in order to facilitate the <br /> ingress and egress to the proposed facility. Roadway <br /> widening improvements with the addition of turn lanes should <br /> also be provided either on "M" or "S" to allow for safe and <br /> unconjested traffic flows in the area of the proposed <br /> accesses . We feel any improvements required should be at the <br /> expense of the developer. Plans to accommodate the increased <br /> drainage from the site should also be taken into account and <br /> the drainage structures across "S" expanded to accommodate <br /> additional drainage flows . This should also be at the <br /> expense of the developer. Both "M" and "S" are access <br /> controlled and if the present access is moved to the west or <br /> relocated to "M" an access permit application or approval <br /> would be required from the Transportation Committee . If the <br /> new access is to be a town road, town board approval would <br /> also be required. <br /> T. BD. <br /> • RES. P H. IN FAVOR OPPOSED NO COM N <br /> OTHER: <br /> R74--e___ C.rO M m / v7T <br /> p 4CTG , /-0 . O r✓/�v <br />