Laserfiche WebLink
e nktt Dane County Planning & Development <br /> F�) 4� ' Room 116, City-County Building, Madison, Wisconsin 53709 Land Division Review <br /> ' cml ,#. 608/266-9086 <br /> is 5 ' <br /> " ��-- Property Listing <br /> 608/266-4120 <br /> December 18, 2000 Surveyor <br /> 608/266-4252 <br /> TO: Town of Vermont Board of ervi <br /> Su sors Zoning <br /> Supervisors 608/266-4266 <br /> Town of Vermont Plan Commission Members <br /> FROM: Jeanie Sielin Director, Dane County Planning and Development <br /> RE: Town and County determination of potential development rights <br /> • <br /> Thank you for contacting me and sharing your concerns regarding the method with which <br /> the Town and County determine potential splits under the 1 per 35 density policy. To <br /> determine acreage owned as of the date specified in Town plans, the County relies on <br /> historical plat books, zoning permit data, certified survey maps, and digital GIS parcel <br /> maps. The Town of Vermont is unique in that it specifies that "...assessor's records and <br /> maps as of January 1, 1985" should be used. This explains the discrepancy between the <br /> County and Town calculation of acreage for the original Bakken farm, and in turn, the <br /> number of available "potential" splits remaining. <br /> My staff reviewed the tax records from 1985 on microfiche in the Treasurers Office, and <br /> found that the Bakken farm totaled 263 acres (7.51 splits). This analysis verifies that <br /> under the Town's rounding provision, the Bakken farm would be entitled to a total of 8 <br /> potential splits. <br /> Our original analysis documented only 7 potential splits for the original Bakken farm, <br /> with 6 prior splits taken at the time. On July 13, 1999 the ZNR Committee approved Mr. <br /> Grover's petition(#7601) to rezone 2 areas from the original Bakken farm, for a total of 8 <br /> splits. The Committee permitted Mr. Grover to "transfer" a split from an adjacent <br /> property (parcel # 0706-212-8000) that was part of the Sullivan farm in 1985. The <br /> Committee conditioned their approval subject to a deed restriction prohibiting further <br /> development on parcel #0706-212-8000. <br /> It appears that the deed restriction on parcel #0706-212-8000 is not needed. This <br /> situation can be remedied by filing a petition to remove the deed restriction on the parcel. <br /> Because of the mistake, we will waive the normal application fee. <br /> The County from now on will use the assessor's records as specified in the Town plan. <br /> We would request that a copy of the 1985 assessment records be forwarded to our <br /> department so that we are working from the same source of information. <br /> Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused, and thank you <br /> for bringing it to my attention. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to <br /> contact me. <br />