|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-1999-07601
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
1990s
>
DCPREZ-1999-07601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2024 1:39:00 PM
Creation date
3/29/2017 9:59:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
07601
Town
Vermont Township
Section Numbers
16, 21
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-1999-07601
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Work Meeting 7/13/99 - Page 1 ITEM 38 - APPLICATION 7601 <br /> Number of splits: Grover, Town of Vermont 15 & 16 <br /> pi Previous rezones to the RH district <br /> La (residential lots created by CSM) CSM 9117 Lot 1 <br /> / \ Proposed <br /> areas to rezone _ <br /> CSM 8669 lot 1 <br /> OHouses existing <br /> before 1/1/1985 , " <br /> air eat <br /> P 1 <br /> CSM 8669 lot 3 <br /> CSM 6261 lot <br /> 1 <br /> O 70 4 <br /> CSM 8669 lot 2 <br /> 2 I2 I CSM 6261 lot2 <br /> 1. 8.3 acres in A2-8, owned by Campbell (CSM # 6261, lot 1, 12/90) <br /> 2. 8.4 acres in A2-8, owned by Evans & Kanikula(CSM# 6261, lot ,2 12/90) <br /> 3. 2.7 acres in RH-1 owned by Grover (petition 6957, CSM # 8669, lot 1) <br /> 4. 11.1 acres in RH-3 owned by Paulette (petition 6957, CSM # 8669, lot 2) <br /> 5. 9.8 acres in RH-3 owned by Paulette (petition 6957, CSM# 8669, lot 3) <br /> 6. 3.9 acres in RH-1 owned by Bakken(petition 7309, CSM # 9117, lot 1) <br /> The Town Plan density policies are: <br /> • "Residential development shall be limited to one `potential development <br /> right"per 35 acres, based on land ownership as of Jan. 1,1985. <br /> • "One house per parcel, existing as of Jan. 1, 1985, will not be counted as <br /> reducing the number of`potential development rights. " <br /> • In situations where there has been no formal recording of the transfer of <br /> "potential development rights"when land has been divided, it is. up to the <br /> past and current owners of the land to reach agreement in writing before <br /> bringing the request before the Town Board. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.