|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-2016-10992
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2016
>
DCPREZ-2016-10992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 1:08:29 PM
Creation date
4/4/2017 1:08:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
10992
Town
Cottage Grove Township
Section Numbers
21
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-2016-10992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
You will hear from many residents that they do not want cars going through Rolling Wheels sub <br /> division to get out, but creating a new access to County N is not the right solution to this problem. <br /> The number of lots that are to be created is something that could be considered to address some of <br /> the neighbors concerns. The comprehensive plan calls for lots up to the size of an acre. If the lots <br /> were at or close to an acre a piece, there would be 11 instead of 15 created, I think this is something <br /> that ZLR should consider because this would reduce the number of houses and therefore the number <br /> of cars going in and out of the neighborhood. At the first Town of Cottage Grove Planning <br /> Commission meeting this was voted on to be presented at the following meeting and it never was. <br /> We have discussed the plans with Don Viney (applicant) and he has agreed to keep the mature trees <br /> on our side of the property and to doing some screening by planting scrubs or trees where there are <br /> none to create a little separation between our property and the sub division. My final request would be <br /> that this be reflected in the plan. <br /> Again, my husband and I are not opposed to this development, and it is consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan, but we want to be sure that the road access does not come at the expense of us <br /> losing our shared driveway to County N, losing a part of our lot, or by compromising public safety by <br /> allowing a new access to County N. We ask that the road access in the original plan be kept as it is. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Cynda <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.