Laserfiche WebLink
DANE COUNTY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD <br /> CO Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as <br /> restored or reestablished and the location of' that corner as previously <br /> restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in <br /> the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> NO KNOWN DISCREPANCY <br /> (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence <br /> location, or (2) a found perpetuated location? <br /> 2.) PERPETUATED <br /> (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, <br /> show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land <br /> survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the <br /> corner location? <br /> NO, THE FOUND MAG NAIL CHECKS WELL WITH 'QUISLING CORNERS' PLAT. I ACCEPTED <br /> THE MAG NAIL POSITION AND REPLACED IT WITH A DANE COUNTY ASPHALT SPIKE. <br /> (I) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject <br /> corner, including monument types set or found, surveyor, and date of survey. <br /> - MONUMENT SHOWN PER 'QUISLING CORNERS' PLAT BY GENSKE DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2010. <br /> Cj) I, af,5 , hereby certify that <br /> the corner location shown on this record was <br /> determined by me or under my direction and control <br /> and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument i al <br /> Record Is correct and complete to the best of' my �� NmHmm��rS��i,,'� <br /> knowledge and belief. • s4,,, <br /> -fr % <br /> * ADAMS <br /> s-2746 <br /> wp,UNAKEE, Q1 <br /> (e:2_ <br /> 3- 30- A/7 %.,, 0 swaJ,,,����''� <br /> Signature Date <br /> 40708032020 <br /> CORNER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: <br />