Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Minutes-Final Unless Amended January 26,2017 <br /> by Committee <br /> •3307 5/27/2004 <br /> •3452 2/22/2007 <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1) Unnecessary Hardship: <br /> Without a variance, the minimum 20 feet required between each two houses would <br /> severely limit the buildable area for Unit#10. <br /> 2) Unique Limitations of the Property: <br /> Location of original small houses originally built close to the lake and close to each <br /> other creates a unique limitation. Improvements to the existing houses over the years <br /> reduced spacing between homes. The condominium status of this parcel with <br /> single-family residences is unusual. <br /> 3)No Harm to Public Interests: <br /> The existing residence is deteriorating and must be replaced to be livable. <br /> Replacement of the home will improve the safety of the neighborhood. The proposed <br /> design conforms to shoreland zoning standards. The Condominium Association <br /> supports approval. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS: <br /> Town of Dunn:July 28, 2016 acknowledgement;and January 10, 2017 action <br /> recommending approval with conditions. <br /> VARIANCES REQUESTED: Purpose: To allow the proposed teardown/rebuild of a <br /> residence. <br /> Minimum side yard required: 20 feet. <br /> Actual Setback:side yard: 7.2 feet. <br /> VARIANCE NEEDED: 12.8 feet. <br /> MINIHAN/STUDZ to approve a variance of 12.8 feet from the required minimum <br /> side yard setback <br /> to allow the replacement of a single family residence subject to the following <br /> conditions: <br /> •An engineer stamped plan be required stating that no change to the floodplain <br /> will result due to this development <br /> •The crawlspace be at or above the base flood elevation <br /> •The first floor be elevated to the flood protection elevation <br /> •Stormwater runoff not be directed toward neighboring condominium units <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Ayes: 5- SCHULZ, STUDZ, PULVERMACHER, LONG and MINIHAN <br /> E. Appeals from Previous Meetings <br /> F. Reports to Commitee <br /> Hilbert informed the Board of OA 67 which, if passed, would have appealed CUP <br /> applications heard before the BOA. Members of the Board requested that, if the OA <br /> passes, Corporation Counsel attend a future meeting to discuss the Board's authority in <br /> such matters. <br /> G. Other Business Authorized by Law <br /> Dane County Page 4 Printed on 1/30/2017 <br />