Laserfiche WebLink
DANE COUNTY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD <br /> CO Describe any material discrepancy between the location of' the corner as <br /> restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously <br /> restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in <br /> the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> THE CALLED FOR MONUMENT WAS A 3'4' REBAR, BUT WE FOUND AN 1 1-4' REBAR IN ITS <br /> PLACE. <br /> (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence <br /> location, or (2) a found perpetuated location? <br /> 2,) PERPETUATED <br /> (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, <br /> show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land <br /> survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the <br /> corner location? <br /> NO, FOUND MONUMENT <br /> (I) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject <br /> corner, including monument types set or found, surveyor, and date of' survey, <br /> - SET 34' REBAR PER CSM 12728 BY PAULSON 2009 <br /> - FOUND 44' REBAR PER PREHN TIE SHEET 2016 <br /> (j) I, a,,, 3 , hereby certify that <br /> the corner location shown on this record was <br /> determined by me or under my direction and control <br /> and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument <br /> Record is correct and complete to the best of my r SurY���pmb����/l <br /> knowledge and belief. CONS y9���i, <br /> 441 i <br /> ���.‘1111111111 - <br /> al AN1S <br /> D <br /> WAM gyp` <br /> kai 7')017 y14r P�`1 u re Date <br /> 40708082020 <br /> CORNER IDENTIFICATI❑N NUMBER: <br />