DCPCUP-2017-02405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'I OWN OF CO'l LANE FRV V13 PLAN CONIMISSION MAI«R 22, 2011 9500 0 and 07L 1 301 8002 0 along Wayward Lune 'l'oin Edige lsiepYssanW the Witte Family. Rule cit, D:ye and Andrew Witte were also nerait picbgda explained that much the Witte Land is in a Federal wildly programmed is loo east for development. 'Iach apply al a for 19.5 aerce wwl of Nadmo Road. but there are only d acres of tillable land Tons shut would be human for development. Richi porpwal ucuas W the new kes from NIWG¢ Road, bra 11 apOCnrm Nrs wmdd regmre Ihadoeing some land hen Dennis and Ann. Bork Man it Imanuke, TINS Janette Lane eapoWd cvnecm over the vudunda and whether they would coconut Aac in duvolnjorach hit Bonds, 2'140 C- Bar -1 Circle said the wetlands have an bottom and have expanded greatly overthe years site has been half. Raffms said a refund Jdincvlion rvauW dcmrminc mhM omilil be ilevelnped, and develoPmem wmdd ueW m eemply wall Dane Ccun{y smtmwv¢rmyntlationx. ]he \Yllus im'nlm r'mgnn9lhng lOnt 11 search thenorthsideofWIDmvoodlnncbepm- tlreNegbhoi 'hood Developmentamy. Kathryn Xies 2881 Witareood Law, and Jeff and Linde Wilson, 2889 Widwo iLm¢wdee cosmic and appos a, muds. Erie Brogan, 275011ope Road, opposed the Writes for Weir being responsible counters a and pond neighbors oral.woman Ww M"plistro is wanon.- with what coudbe way worse than what is proposed. ]OUT ION trySdnocde✓Lasoh to move acres westef Nobel Road and I I acres north of Witewood Lane from lire An Pwacrvution to the Neighborhood DOVdoryncN led. MOTION CARRITD 42 Qlmn0lon and DvPlayee opposed). b) Diseusn /Consider armvnling item 2. under Development Pollees par Agricultural Preservation A rva regaidiug farm residences built forms May 15, 1982: 1 h original plat adopted in 20R allmvcd 2r aphllingofformitml form houses without the use of a RON, woh a stract date of lanunry 1, 2011. It scams that when the also was overhauled in 3015, (]to opportunity to split off or n,iSual wan house without using a RDU cars inadvertently put back in. Discussion was that this was morounituad and the rush Gould be amended to dome a v RDU when relining of an original farm house. of OrderlVASIOns rousted by rommisaion members and/or planning consultants: puffers suggested updating municipal and EXI bunmdeive, send mvlaWg0e adoption procedures m delay donbotion of the spin used amendment to meet statutory requirements until after the Count, as adopted the umendmcm MOTION by Nh,ehl /DOPlayee dimpling Reffers W drop the changes recommended in a) and discussed in b) and e) above into an nmandmenl to be nonsidncd at the April mec5ng. MOTION CARRIED 40. Royal Oak Associates/ Gap Unfai, applicant. ffiUotmin Norwegian Yanm LLC, landowner-. a) Pa¢0107113T1 -9501 0 at I Rua US Ihvy 12 if 19 seeking rezone of 1 3 raze ryom A I -EX to R 3 to separate a 2- unit Firmly residence. Andras advised that undo the lawn's rnment clam. no RDU would be taaled m sc0 ma this midnal farm house if it true a single fmnily farm. however one is nei for the scound unit. fruit ION by DuPlayNBehmplm le recommend opmtival of dui ronie of I3 acres fora A] EX to If 3A to sgarale a 2 -unit family residence, pending a density Sony to show that there is a MU evadable tar the second family rafdeme MOTION CARRIED 40. Ed Ill 07 11JO1- 9000 -1 at 1924 US 1 [ivy 12 k 18: seeking rezone at 19 acres I'm AI -EX to R A to reforms; a single OamOy tccidume Thu It ... pray has two Ism mcxi ma it, but Ibcowners pope I at Arrohm N3. pg. 17