Laserfiche WebLink
RESOURCE PROTECTION: Areas of resource protection corridor associated with wetland,floodplain, and steep slope <br /> topography are located on the property. No development is proposed within the environmentally sensitive area. <br /> ZLR PUBLIC HEARING 6-25-19:The ZLR committee postponed action on the petition to allow time for the applicant to <br /> revise the proposal to meet town comprehensive plan policies. <br /> STAFF UPDATE:Staff had noted a number of concerns about this proposal in the initial report including the fact that the <br /> application was submitted without the written acknowledgment or consent of the new owners of lots 1, 2, and 4. The <br /> applicant has since provided written confirmation from those owners consenting to the petition.The applicant also <br /> understands that the petition must be amended to request the RR-8 zoning to reflect the anticipated resulting lot sizes. <br /> Staff had also noted concerns that the proposal is not consistent with adopted town plan policies which generally <br /> require smaller lots clustered together so as to avoid fragmentation of agricultural and conservation lands. Plan policies <br /> also encourage lot lines to follow existing property boundaries and natural features.The applicant has revised the <br /> proposal in a manner that more closely aligns with town plan requirements for lot design by squaring off lots so that <br /> they follow property boundaries.The following changes are being proposed: <br /> , <br /> 1) Proposed lot 1 would be extended "'66' I, Catteept Pisa <br /> to the north to the northerly property I <br /> boundary resulting in a rectangular ,�a,�a a <br /> parcel of approximately 10 acres. �; "'e'8T"� """` <br /> 2) Proposed expansion of lot 2 has been 14 I� <br /> 1.a ,a. <br /> — >U.�> w�RI, <br /> dropped from the petition. ' ` 4,, wac <br /> Yjl sd E S9 acre <br /> 3) Proposed lots 3 and 4 have been ,�ar,sr <br /> ,st 0' 1 <br /> extended "'66'to the east to the f a,r,r, •- <br /> property boundary. , l <br /> 4) Due to the changes to lots 3 and 4, a I v$ x .�` i <br /> new proposed lot 5 would be created at I; j f <br /> to.crr: y <br /> the south end of the property as a I.',1 i 44a�M� Ii <br /> remnant parcel with a requested zoning 171 , ,a,`T,t y; 4 n"' <br /> classification of FP-1.The applicant fl'�ll �`� <br /> ...� arm t.sl is.�,�.. <br /> intends to apply for a rezoning in the , t «-9 <br /> future on proposed lot 5 to utilize the I 1 i u — =t – —•me acre <br /> final housing density unit available to 0 I 4 £% <br /> the property. it <br /> 1. � g „o_ ! f� <br /> An updated legal description and preliminary I i x I ; <br /> map have been provided documenting the It _.: _ ,.ate 1 Prepay.]Oar <br /> amended boundary descriptions of lots 1-4 and <br /> cr., 4 z AM ; ` 10.8 sass 11 , <br /> 9 s �,�:,,51S_• <br /> proposed new remnant lot 5. Since the - , <br /> proposal will create more than 4 parcels, a l2ro-�� s.��"` * : x <br /> subdivision plat is required.The applicant is � x 4. <br /> ��;� .. <br /> 1 IRE'49� <br /> working with his surveyor to prepare a 5-lot zs• ■ v.,avc w: <br /> plat for the property. <br /> ks . �... <br /> I There would be no new residential >� =g Lee 5 ALP sr <br /> `~' f <br /> - ,FO../'..d 11/4 - .. <br /> development potential created as a result of 1h '°"` _ \ � <br /> .4. iiifte the proposal. Staff recommends the following - <br /> conditions of approval: I <br /> woore6E 7,24.90, <br /> 1. The development restriction/ y F0 30■ To <br /> "environmental setback line" currently _ ..- .3e 1"=3^R <br /> shown on lots 3 and 4 of CSM #14796 WA .No. . -ii = }ate <:9 <br /> shall be depicted in the same location on proposed lots 3 and 4 of the subdivision plat. <br />