|
10.153(5)(b)2.e.—(5)(b)6.
<br /> v. specific relationship to the remainder of the and recommendations on the proposed SIP to
<br /> PUD included in the approved GDP, nearby the zoning administrator within 60 days.
<br /> properties and existing and planned streets, Alternatively, at the sole discretion of the
<br /> highways and other transportation affected town, the town may forward its
<br /> improvements; and comments and recommendations to the zoning
<br /> vi. a development schedule indicating project administrator prior to the zoning administrator's
<br /> stages. determination of SIP submittal completeness, in
<br /> e. A written description demonstrating the which case the 60 day review period is not
<br /> consistency of the proposed SIP with the required.
<br /> approved GDP and the criteria in s. 10.153(4), 4. The planning and development director
<br /> and identifying any and all deviations between and zoning administrator shall review the
<br /> the approved GDP and the proposed SIP. submitted SIP with reference to the GDP
<br /> f. An SIP map at a minimum scale of 1 inch approval, the evaluation criteria in section
<br /> equals 100 feet(11" x 17" reduction shall also be 10.153(4), and town comments and
<br /> provided) of the proposed project showing at recommendations. Within 50 days of receipt of a
<br /> least the following information: complete submittal (of within 10 days of such
<br /> i. locations, sizes, dimensions and permitted receipt in the event that the town offers
<br /> uses of all lots and building sites (detailed lot comments and recommendations before the
<br /> layout/conceptual subdivision plan required for zoning administrator's determination of
<br /> SIPs with multiple lots); completeness is made), the director and zoning
<br /> ii. locations, sizes and dimensions of all administrator shall determine whether the SIP is
<br /> structures (minimum setbacks and yard areas); consistent with the approved GDP.
<br /> iii. delineations of all water bodies, wetlands, Inconsistencies shall require an amendment to
<br /> floodplains, steep slopes and other sensitive the GDP according to the procedure in sub.
<br /> environmental areas; 10.153(5)(a). If generally consistent with the
<br /> iv. locations, dimensions and surface type of approved GDP and the evaluation criteria, the
<br /> all driveways, walkways, trails, parking and director and zoning administrator shall, within
<br /> loading areas and roads; such timeframe, approve the SIP as submitted or
<br /> v. detailed off-street- parking lot and stall with modifications necessary to achieve full
<br /> design; consistency. If approved with modifications, the
<br /> vi. location of all public and private utilities; applicant shall submit modified SIP materials
<br /> vii. location, type and intensity of outdoor consistent with the approval before the issuance
<br /> lighting; of zoning permits.
<br /> viii. location of recreational and open space 5. The approved SIP shall provide the basis
<br /> areas and facilities, specifically describing those for the issuance of all subsequent permits
<br /> that are to be reserved or dedicated for public including, but not limited to, zoning permits, to
<br /> use; and allow development with the SIP area. Any
<br /> ix. statistical data on lot sizes in the portion of an approved SIP for which a zoning
<br /> development, the exact areas of all development permit is not issued within three years of SIP
<br /> lots and pads, density/intensity of various parts approval shall expire, and a new SIP must be
<br /> of the development, floor area ratios, and lot submitted and approved for that area before any
<br /> coverage percentages. development may occur.
<br /> g. A detailed landscaping plan for the area 6. As an alternative to SIP technical review
<br /> included in the SIP, specifying the location, by the zoning administrator, planning and
<br /> species, and installed and mature size of all development director and affected town,
<br /> existing and proposed trees, shrubs and fencing. approval of the GDP may include detailed
<br /> h. A signage plan for the project, including restrictive covenants specific to the PUD that
<br /> the type, location, height, dimensions, lighting establish a design review committee and design
<br /> and sign face area of all proposed signs. review process to review SIP submittals so as to
<br /> i. An erosion control, drainage and ensure compliance with the GDP. All other
<br /> stormwater management plan. requirements for the SIP per para. (b) above
<br /> j. Building elevations for all buildings, shall remain in effect if this option is approved by
<br /> including building heights and materials. the town and county as part of the GDP.
<br /> 3. After the SIP submittal is complete, it shall [HISTORY: 10.153 cr.,OA 44,2009-10,-pub.02/15/10.]
<br /> be forwarded to the town clerk of the affected
<br /> town. The town may then forward any comments
<br /> Page 10-42
<br /> rev. 073113
<br />
|