|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dane County Code Of Ordinances
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
Dane County Code of Ordinances
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Dane County Code Of Ordinances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2022 11:31:25 AM
Creation date
11/18/2022 11:31:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Records
Document_Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 10.194(2)(d) .;10.194(7) <br /> (d) The applicant's equipment would cause required .number of - collocation sites. <br /> - electromagnetic interference with equipment on Notwithstanding the height and number of <br /> the existing communication tower(s) within the . collocation sites on the tower as initially placed or <br /> area in which the applicant's equipment must be constructed, the communication tower design <br /> located, or the equipment on the existing ' approved and permitted under this ordinance shall <br /> communication tower(s) would cause interference be for a tower of 150 feet in height and shall <br /> with the applicant's equipment and the include the required collocation sites. The holder <br /> interference, from whatever source, cannot be of a permit under this section shall make the <br /> eliminated at a reasonable cost; or collocation sites required hereunder available for <br /> (e) The fees, costs or contractual provisions the placement of technologically compatible <br /> required by the owner in order to collocate on an antenna arrays and equipment upon contractual <br /> existing communication tower are unreasonable provisions which are standard in the industry and <br /> relative to industry norms; or at prevailing market rates allowing the permit • <br /> (1) The applicant demonstrates that there are holder to recoup the cost of providing the <br /> other factors that render existing communication collocation sites and a fair return on investment. <br /> towers unsuitable or unavailable and establishes (6) Unless otherwise provided herein, a <br /> that the public interest is best served by the conditional use permit is required for any <br /> placement or. construction of a new modification of a communication tower which <br /> communication tower. significantly alters the appearance or structural <br /> (3) The cost of eliminating impediments to integrity of the tower or which involves the <br /> collocation shall be deemed reasonable if it does installation of antenna or equipment differing in <br /> not exceed by 25 percent the cost of constructing a size and function from that previously installed on <br /> new tower on which to mount applicant's the tower. The committee shall apply the <br /> equipment. standards under section 10.255(2), D. C. Ords., <br /> (4) In the event the committee determines that it when considering an application for a conditional <br /> is necessary to consult with a third party in use permit to allow the modification of an existing <br /> considering the factors listed in subsection (2) communication tower. In addition, the committee <br /> above, all reasonable costs and expenses shall consider the reasonableness, based on <br /> associated with such consultation shall be borne by economic and technological feasibility, of <br /> the applicant. Failure to pay such costs and conditioning the grant of the conditional use <br /> expenses or provide information requested by the permit upon modifying the tower in a manner <br /> committee shall be grounds for denial or which would accommodate the collocation of one <br /> revocation of a conditional use permit. The or more additional antenna arrays. <br /> applicant may provide to the committee the names (7) Upon written inquiry by the committee the <br /> of consultants which the applicant believes are recipient•of a conditional use permit under this <br /> qualified to assist in resolving the issues before the section shall have the burden of presenting <br /> committee. credible evidence establishing to a reasonable <br /> (5) In applying the standards and criteria set certainty the continued compliance with all <br /> forth in section 10.255(2), D. C. Ords., to conditions placed upon the conditional use permit. <br /> applications for conditional use permits for the Failure to establish compliance with all conditions <br /> placement or construction of a communication placed upon the conditional use permit shall be <br /> tower the committee shall, unless it is shown to be grounds for revocation of the permit. In the event <br /> unreasonable, condition the grant of the permit the committee determines that it is necessary to <br /> upon the applicant placing or constructing the consult with a third party to ascertain compliance <br /> communication tower so as to accommodate, at a with conditions on a conditional use permit, all <br /> minimum height of 150 feet, the collocation of two reasonable costs and expenses associated with <br /> additional antenna arrays similar in -size and such consultation shall be borne by the holder of <br /> function to that placed on the tower by the the subject conditional use permit. <br /> applicant. Collocation sites need not be available <br /> on the tower as initially placed or constructed, (continued on page 10-3461 <br /> provided that the tower will support at the <br /> specified minimum height the later addition of the <br /> • <br /> • Page 10-34A <br /> rev. 103197 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.