TIE 40712152000 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. None (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or (2) a found perpetuated location? A found perpetuated location. (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? Not Applicable. (i) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types set or found, surveyor, and date of survey. February 10, 1992 - David Riesop found no evidence of occupation as the corner fell in a plowed field. He found no surveys making mention of this corner other than a 1865 survey by Warner in which he set the 40 corner to the West. Riesop reset the position of this corner at an equal distance from Section Corners to the North and South and at a distance prorated to Warner's survey from the Center of Section. The proration was obtained by comparing measurements along the South line of the SE 1/4 of Section 15. (j) I, Bradley L. Tisdale, Affix Land Surveyor Seal hereby certify that the corner location shown on this record was determined by me or under my direction and correct and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is correct complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. 05/05/2023 Signature Date % 1 1 1 I , at SV o�i% w` v BRADLEY L. T1SDALE 'k S-2824- WAUNAKEE WI •�, �%