DCPREZ-0000-07440 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMPOSITE REPORT - Page 2 APPLICATION NO. STAFF COMMENTS ZONING REVIEW 26. 7440 Heidi Stiller&Allan Bachmann and Bachmann Building Partnership (Thom Grenlie and Marilyn Dreger,agents),Verona 04 A-1EX to RH-3 and R-4 Stiller&Bachmann wish to create a 15 acre SFR/farmette parcel with frontage on Woods Road, on which to build their new home. Under the name of Bachmann Building Partner-ship,they also own the adjoining 20.878 acres with frontage on Mid-Town Road. The two parcels were divided without the required CSM, according to Norb Scribner, so rezoning and a Certified Survey Map are required. The 20.9 acre parcel has `grandfathered' multi-family residential uses,including: 1. An older farmhouse converted to(3)apartments; 2. A 4-townhouse unit apartment building; 3. An 30'x104' 8-stall garage; 4. A 16'x22' "laundry building"; and 5. A 26'x40' barn,which is 26' high. Stiller&Bachmann wish to bring the existing uses into compliance by rezoning to R-4 Multi-Family Residential and recording this parcel as a lot in a CSM. However, the R-4 District limits the uses of accessory buildings to"uses and buildings, clearly incidental and necessary to permit use on the premises"(DCCO Sections 10.08(1)(a)and 10.05(1)(d)), so the use of the barn is in question. In addition,the area and height of accessory buildings in the R-4 district is limited to: • Area: Total floor area of the accessory buildings may not exceed total floor area of the residential buildings; and • Height: May not exceed 12' "average height"(average of peak and eave height.) Both of these limits appear to have been exceeded;therefore, one or more Variances would be required to permit rezoning to the R-4 District and the recording of the CSM. Note: Previous Pet 7037(09/23/1997 ZNR Comm. P.H.)to rezone a 15 acre parcel from A-1EX to RH-3, and to rezone a to a 20.83 acre parcel from A-1EX to R-4(0.6 acres)for the two apartment buildings and A-2 (20.2 acres)for the outbuildings and remaining land, was approved subject to a Deed Restriction"that there shall be no further residential development on the A-2 and R-4 rezone areas." However,no CSM was recorded because the City of Madison(Corporate Limits 0.3 miles from A-2 parcel)would not approve the CSM, so the Petition became void. REGIONAL PLANNING Petition 7440. A similar petition was reviewed for this site(Petition 7037,Public Hearing 9/23/97).It was subsequently approved with the condition"that there shall be no further residential development on the A-2 and R-4 rezone areas."No CSM was recorded and the petition became void. Since the purpose is to bring the parcels into compliance,it appears the same condition should still apply: "That there shall be no further residential development on the rezoned area" ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (septic, etc.) None DANE COUNTY HIGHWAY None OTHER