|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPCUP-0000-01369
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
CUPS 00001-02383
>
DCPCUP-0000-01369
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2015 12:41:11 PM
Creation date
10/19/2015 12:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
CUP
Petition Number
07271
Town
Pleasant Springs Township
Section Numbers
25
AccelaLink
DCPCUP-0000-01369
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FROM : JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHONE NO. : 6088737521 Nov. 07 1998 11:29AM P2 <br /> SELL , GIERHART & MOORE , S . C . <br /> I.AWYERB SUZANNE E WILLIAMS <br /> BOCER L.CIERHART 44 EAST MIFFLIN STREET w.SCOTY MCANDREW <br /> JOHN M.MOOPS P.O. BOX 1 807 STEPHEN E.EHLRE <br /> HuCH H BELL MARE B.HAYELBAKER <br /> BTE■EH J.CAULUM MADISON, WISCONSIN 53701-1 807 ppVCE F.ANGERS <br /> WARD I. RICHTR (608) 257.37134 , JoHN M.CWRIBTENSOH <br /> WILLIAM A,ABBOTT <br /> FACSIMILE- 16091 267-3757 <br /> JOHN W MARM ON <br /> MAIL: Thazoleme�con.td8.IBt GLEN H B¢LL <br /> COURY COMM .5 0NER <br /> 11002.1000 <br /> A♦ wILLIAM C.WILLIAMS <br /> DIRECT UNE. <br /> 1808)259.2323 <br /> November 5, 1998 <br /> Ms. Helen Johnson <br /> Dane County Supervisor <br /> 908 Kriedeman Dr. <br /> Stoughton, WI 53589 <br /> RE: Milwat kee Repeater Rezoning/Town of Pleasant Springs <br /> Our Fil 045104 <br /> Dear Supervisor Johnson: <br /> Thank you for your memorandum of October 21, 1998, a copy of which was mailed <br /> to me recently by the Town of Pleasant Springs. It appears that the County is taking the <br /> position that the County can unilaterally rescind a condition on a rezoning which everyone <br /> seems to acknowledge could not have been originally imposed without the consent and <br /> involvement of the Town. This is a very curious dichotomy,but we will have to live with it. <br /> More to the point, we should evaluate whether the rezoning which authorized <br /> construction of this I ower should be rescinded. It appears that the Corporation Counsel is <br /> taking the position tl.at the County Board's rezoning of the land to allow the Tower is a <br /> severable action. T le Town Board never would have approved the rezoning had the <br /> inducement of the ag•eed-upon rerouting of the access easement not been part of the action. <br /> Under these circumstances, we believe that the rezoning of the Tower is not severable. The <br /> Town respectfully re:pests that the County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.