DCPREZ-0000-07287 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Gaukel 03/03/94 Page 3 1. Upgrade of the existing camping facility will require approval of RE-1 Recreational zoning and a Conditional Use Permit. Some of the B-1 area has to be used for this. 2 . Renovation of the existing lodge and a public restaurant are permitted uses in the B-1 District. The current B-1 area should be reduced to just what is necessary for the lodge and restaurant, including required parking. 3 . (A) Relocation of existing mobile homes and the proposed new area for mobile homes constitutes a mobile home park which requires approval of either R-4 Residential or B-1 zoning and a Conditional Use Permit. I have suggested that the R-4 zoning would be better accepted than B-1. Either zoning should be deed restricted to allow only a mobile home park. (B) Most mobile home parks rent or lease their spaces leaving the property in one legal parcel. The Town Board has reported that there may be a desire to sell the spaces which in effect would be creating separate lots. If this is desired it will require compliance with subdivision regulations which specifies that a platted subdivision must be submitted and approved to allow creation of more than 5 lots. 4 . The potential new lodge, if in conjunction with the camping facility, could be permitted in the RE-1 District but inclusion of a public restaurant would require approval of B-1 zoning. Rental of lodging rooms would require approval of B-1 zoning- with a Conditional Use Permit for such. 5. The potential 3 single family residences will each require a separate parcel and approval of appropriate zoning. Approval of a Certified Survey to permit creation of the lots would be required and compliance with subdivision regulations specifies that each lot must have a minimum frontage of 66 feet provided on a public dedicated road. Another option would be to combine the three residences into a multifamily unit which, subject to approvals, could be permitted in the B-i District with a Conditional Use Permit. This could alleviate the necessity of creating separate parcels. 6. All of the improvement and potential expansion is proposed to be serviced by private septic system. The County Executive has expressed concerns about development on septic system and, in fact, has vetoed zoning requested for such development. I have suggested to Mr. Harty that this proposal be discussed with the County Executive. cc: Roxbury Town Board Roxbury Plan Committee G. Gunderman, Director LR&R Dept.