|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-07261
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-07261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2015 3:53:40 PM
Creation date
11/6/2015 3:53:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
07261
Town
Berry Township
Section Numbers
6
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-07261
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD <br /> 6157 COUNTY HWY P <br /> DANE,WI 53529 <br /> Sherri Endres, Clerk 608/849-7887 <br /> July 9, 1998 L , <br /> D <br /> JUL i 3 1998 <br /> James Gregorius <br /> Dane County Planning & Development 1) p�ToNsi lNG&DEVELOPMEt T <br /> Zoning Division N6 DllllStON <br /> Room 116, City-County Bldg. <br /> Madison, WI 53709-0001 <br /> Dear Mr. Gregorius, <br /> The Springfield Town Board would very much appreciate your sharing the following <br /> comments at the Work Committee meeting to be held July 14, 1998 in regards to <br /> tition#725)for Marion and Irene Thompson. <br /> It is the understanding of the Board that this petition was received with mixed <br /> reaction at the public hearing by committee members. The Town Board recently received RPC <br /> staff comments, which they would like to respond to. Enclosed is a copy of those <br /> staff comments as well. The committee will note that these quotations are taken from the <br /> Agricultural Preservation District section of the Towns' land use plan. Though the <br /> property in question is zoned A-lEx., it is a grandfathered, non-conforming parcel, which <br /> obviously is not productive agriculturally. Our land use plan states in its' introduction <br /> that it is " not an ordinance, but rather, a policy tool ". When this plan was put into force <br /> it was meant to be a guideline, with each request being evaluated and judged as to the best <br /> use of the land here in Springfield. Not every situation will be easily categorized. This <br /> application would probably be better suited to the following section of the land use plan <br /> 6. Development criteria for non-farm residential development are as follows: <br /> a. A minimum lot size of 1 acre. <br /> The RPC comments also refer to #7, saying that"divisions" of substandard lots are not <br /> allowed. We choose to differ, as no where in that statement does it state divisions are <br /> not allowed. It only states that those lots are simply permitted to continue. <br /> We also understand that there was concern that the new home site would be <br /> within 200 feet of the Waunakee Marsh and that wouldn't be allowed. <br /> Your committee (and ultimately County approval)just granted a rezone for two new homes <br /> adjacent to the property in question(Petition#7067, Karls) within the last few months. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.