Laserfiche WebLink
II. ANALYSIS <br /> A. Compliance with County Ordinances <br /> Ski resorts are permitted uses in the RE-1 district,but a conditional use permit is required for <br /> night-time operation. Ancillary uses, such as parking lots, associated with permitted uses are <br /> also allowed. <br /> B. Compliance with Adopted Plans <br /> Town Land Use Plan <br /> The current Town of Vermont Land Use Plan, last amended in 1992, shows the proposed rezone <br /> area as within an agricultural preservation area. For residential development,the town <br /> requirements include: <br /> • proof of suitability for a septic system; <br /> • public road frontage; <br /> • a maximum density of one unit per 35 acres owned on January 1, 1985; <br /> • building location must minimize loss of trees and grading of land; <br /> • driveway must provide for safe passage of emergency vehicles; <br /> • no land with a slope of over 25%may be disturbed, and; <br /> • erosion control plans for all cuts and fills. <br /> A considerable portion of the proposed RH-2 lot, including the entire road frontage, has slopes <br /> that exceed 25%. The soils on this lot are problematic at best for septic system installation. <br /> Without a detailed site plan, and possibly field verification, it is impossible to tell whether the <br /> standards of the town plan are met. <br /> The 1992 plan does allow commercial recreation proposals in agricultural preservation areas, <br /> subject to the following limitations: <br /> • those uses having minimal impact on the natural environment; <br /> • uses with access to a state or county highway. If a town road is involved,the applicant must <br /> demonstrate minimal impact to neighbors. If the town road requires improvement,the <br /> applicant will be asked to pay their share of such improvement. <br /> • the size of the proposal must be limited to protect the rural character and preserve the natural <br /> beauty of the town. <br /> The plan does not make a distinction between expansion of existing recreational uses and the <br /> creation of new ones. Again, without a detailed site plan,the impact of the current petition is <br /> difficult to judge. It is not clear from the application exactly where on the 14 acre lot the new <br /> parking lot would be, nor what use would be proposed for the remaining portion of this lot. <br /> The Town of Vermont has an amendment to their land use plan pending under County review <br /> (County Board Resolution# 21). The County is currently awaiting surrounding community and <br /> RPC comments before the ZNR's scheduled public hearing on July 28, 1998. If approved,this <br /> plan amendment would make the following changes to policies relevant to this petition: <br /> • require development on slopes greater than 20%to adopt measures that reduce soil loss to 15 <br /> tons per acre or less; <br /> • require development within 1,000 feet of any surface water or wetland to reduce soil loss to <br /> 7.5 tons per acre or less, and; <br /> 2 <br />