|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-07109
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-07109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 4:05:09 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 3:25:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
07109
Town
Berry Township
Section Numbers
2
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-07109
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mel Bankes <br /> 5351 County Highway KP <br /> Cross Plains, WI 53528 August 12, 1998 <br /> { <br /> Oscar Wendt <br /> 8773 Scott Reeve Rd <br /> Cross Plains,WI 53528 <br /> Stan Theis <br /> 6253 County Highway KP <br /> Mazomanie,WI 53560 <br /> • Barb Ripp-Statz <br /> 4890 Carya Rd. <br /> Black Earth,WI 53515 <br /> Bill Carlson <br /> 5139 County Highway P <br /> Cross Plains,WI 53528 <br /> Dear Members of the Berry Town Board, <br /> I oppose the proposed rezone of the Keuler(Formerly Street)property. Please vote against this <br /> proposed zoning change. My reasons are as follows: <br /> 1. This proposed rezone violates the spirit and the principle of the current Town Land Use plan. <br /> Lots are larger than 10 acres. The current plan calls for lots of 2 to 10 acres. The current land <br /> use plan requires each lot to have highway access and prohibits shared driveways. Although the <br /> - redrawn rezone request may provide "paper" access, it still includes a shared driveway. The <br /> Town Board,at the urging of a petition signed by over 300 residents, rejected a revision in the <br /> land use plan that would have changed these two aspects of the plan. Opponents of the revised <br /> plan stated quite clearly that they liked the present land use plan. Thus, until the people of the <br /> Town approve a revised plan, we should follow both the letter and spirit of the existing plan. <br /> 2. The rezone provides a classic example of a developer taking advantage of a public investment <br /> in the park,and asking that policies be bent to allow the development to proceed. <br /> 3. The county executive's land use program calls for buffers around public open spaces. <br /> Building houses in the proposed locations on property immediately across from the Indian Lake <br /> Park directly opposes that initiative. <br /> 4. Bending the rules to allow a developer from outside the Town to build houses for sale in the <br /> Town sets very bad precedent. <br /> Thank you for your consideration of this issue. <br /> Since 1 <br /> i1 <br /> 6,.o, 4.O <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.