DCPCUP-0000-01418 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMPOSITE REPORT-Page 5 Application No. CUP 1418 suppression measures would be required on trucks and equipment. The applicant proposes an eight foot berm virtually surrounding the property which would reduce noise and visual impacts. The ultimate reclamation of both sites would greatly improve the appearance of the area, which could in turn enhance uses, values, and enjoyment of other properties in the area. 3. That the conditional use will not impede orderly development of the surrounding property. The expansion of this extraction area may make continued residential development west of the subject property more difficult to achieve in the next few years. This owner of this residentially zoned property and the CUP area are the same,however. Ultimately,reclamation of the entire extraction area would improve this area for additional recreational and residential development, if desired. 4. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary site improvements. Proper erosion control techniques will have to be approved and maintained to ensure that construction site drainage does not impact surface waters. Access would be through the existing non-conforming site from Mussen Road, and should be restricted elsewhere. 5. That adequate measures are being taken to provide ingress and egress to minimize traffic congestion. Trucks will have to use town roads to reach the property, primarily from CTH Y. The town and operator have agreed to enter a contract to require operator repair of any damage to town roads. 6. That the conditional use shall comply with all applicable regulations. Erosion control and special exception permits will be required. According to S. 10.123(3)(a), the Committee must also consider the following relevant factors when approving conditional use permits in the A-1 Exclusive District: a) The statement of purposes of the zoning ordinance and the A-1 District. b) The potential for conflict with agricultural use. c) The need of the proposed use for a location in an agricultural area. d) The availability of alternative locations. e) Compatibility with existing or permitted use on adjacent lands. f) The productivity of lands involved. g) The location of the proposed use so as to reduce to a minimum the amount of productive agricultural lands converted. h) The need for public services created by the proposed use. i) The availability of adequate public services and the ability of affected local units of government to provide them without an unreasonable burden. j) The effect of the proposed use on water or air pollution, soil erosion and rare or irreplaceable natural resources. G. On October 20, 1997, the Roxbury Town Board recommended approval of the request and suggested 14 conditions. All of these conditions are reflected in the suggested conditions for approval below.