Laserfiche WebLink
• APR 05 'Shl. 12:21P11 FOTH S VAN DKE <br /> Foth &Van Dyke <br /> engineers • archltocts • 5 ciehtiSts <br /> Ns0,00r <br /> - ' <br /> , . <br /> , . <br /> April 4, 1996 <br /> • <br /> - , <br /> Dane County Zoning and <br /> Natural Resources Committee • ' <br /> • City-County Building <br /> • Room 118 <br /> •210 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard <br /> • • • Madison, WI 53709 -• <br /> . , . <br /> Dear Zoning and Natural Resources Committee Members: <br /> , <br /> . 'Re; Conditional Use Permit 1298 . <br /> • <br /> , • <br /> . . . <br /> This letter provides information regarding questions about the Conditional Use Permit <br /> (CUP) No. 1298 that were raised during the April 2, 1996; Working Committee meeting, <br /> There were questions regarding the depth to groundwater as it relates to the proposed . <br /> . . <br /> . • <br /> bottom of the quarry. The information that is available to us indicates That groundwater is <br /> at Elevation 990 under the high point of the property based on an unpublished geologic <br /> • . report for the area. Well construction reports obtained from the Wisconsin Geological and <br /> . <br /> • • Natural History Survey from the section in which the proposed quarry would be located <br /> indicate that the depth to water in private water supply wells varies from 20 to 100'feet <br /> • below the ground. The owner of the house on the property. Mr.'Bud Reiner, has reported <br /> that it is approximately 60 feet to water in his well. We estimate the elevation of the water <br /> table to be at 940 at the house. The unpublished geologic report and the information from <br /> Mr. Reiner are consistent with the generally recognized condition that the water table <br /> . surface elevation reflects the land surface elevation. • ' • ' <br /> • <br /> A question was asked regarding the impact of blasting on groundwater, From a physical <br /> perspective, we would expect that there would be slight instantaneous increase in water <br /> levels in wells due to the compression wave from the blast, This would dissipate <br /> immediately after the blast and'the wells would return to their normal water levels. The <br /> effect in the wells would be essentially unnoticed. <br /> ' As far as water quality issues related to blasting, we would expect no change. The <br /> . materials used to do the blasting are essentially consumed by the blast. Any minute <br /> .quantities of chemicals left will be on the limestone that is crushed and removed from the <br /> site, • <br /> - . <br /> • There was a question regarding the size of the quarry operation as it relates to air <br /> • monitoring requirements., The existing quarry at CUP 788 has had an annual production <br /> of between 35,000 and 72,000 tons per year Mr. Ziegler reports that it is his intention to <br /> • AMB2195Z004\L-DACOUN\4000 • .• <br /> • . . . . • <br /> 40S ScionceDrIve.Suite ADO • Madlson.W153711-1068 ••S0S-238-4761 • Fax:56E1-2384633 <br />