Laserfiche WebLink
• FW: Shoreland zoning permit review - Hilbert, Hans Page 3 of 6 <br /> From: Hilbert, Hans <br /> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:43 AM <br /> To: 'Michael C. Wussow' <br /> Cc: Tuggle, Jason <br /> Subject: RE: Shoreland zoning permit review <br /> Mike, <br /> The replacement of the asphalt with a pervious paver would work to get you back under 15%, however it would <br /> still require a shoreland mitigation plan/permit. I'll let Jason chime in on what is most feasible given that the <br /> vegetation buffer zone exists and there is a relatively small amount of impervious surface putting you over 15%. <br /> Hans <br /> From: Michael C. Wussow [mailto:mcwussowCagmail.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:34 AM <br /> To: Hilbert, Hans <br /> Cc: Tuggle, Jason <br /> Subject: RE: Shoreland zoning permit review <br /> Hi Hans, <br /> Thanks for the response. <br /> Hans and Jason, <br /> I had my architects run the numbers within 300' of the lake. Below is the information they came back <br /> to me with. Jason I will give you a call to discuss. <br /> "If you look at Phase 1 only(excludes screen porch and Ground floor additions) <br /> Then you have 58,649 SF of lot within 300' of the lake. Of that you will have 8,701 SF of impervious surface for a <br /> ratio of 14.8%This includes the existing wood deck. <br /> If you include the Phase 2 (Screen porch and Ground Floor addition) you have 9,888 SF of impervious surface for <br /> a ratio of 16.8% <br /> You do have 2,681 SF of impervious asphalt pavement within 300' of the lake. You might want to inquire if <br /> replacing a minimum 1,100 sf with permeable pavers which would take you under the 15%(post construction) <br /> be an option to avoid the shoreland mitigation permit. They might only require the pavers when the phase 2 is <br /> built which would push the impervious surface ratio over the 15%." <br /> Best, <br /> https://mail.countyofdane.com/owa/ 1/12/2016 <br />