|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-06868
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-06868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2016 10:56:09 AM
Creation date
2/4/2016 9:03:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
06868
Town
York Township
Section Numbers
35, 36
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-06868
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tor, Eorche.rt 4146233431 <br /> P. 05 <br /> March 29, 1991 <br /> To: John Prosser,Town Supervisor,Town of York <br /> Other Town and County Officials(as appropriate) <br /> Re: Proposed new construction in the Town of York <br /> It has come to my attention that there has again been a request by Mark Srnithback to build a house or <br /> houses in the land-locked woods within view of our farm. The request,and the passage of that request by <br /> the Town of York Board,frankly surprises and disturbs me. <br /> Mr. Srnithback presented a ill-conceived development plan to the Town of York Board last fall, which <br /> included the development of the 40 acres of woods and three separate driveways. As you recall at that <br /> time, about 10 neighboring homeowners noted the dangerous precedence of the plan as it opened the <br /> ability for others to similarly convert the other land-locked woods parcels into housing developments. As <br /> was stated at that meeting, there are approximately 55 such parcels in the Town of York. <br /> Mr. Snuthback apparently returned in front of the Town of York Board on March 10, accompanied by a <br /> lawyer. His arguments for development were similar with the exception of a single private diive that <br /> would be deed restricted as a private road His stated use for development of the wooded area (from <br /> multiple houses to a single dwelling,and a variety of stated acreage for each parcel)has created a level of <br /> distrust among all of the other landowners in the area-I clearly see a probable scenario of multiple <br /> unit development in the area and not(as stated)a single proprietor building for his immediate <br /> family. As I was in attendance at that meeting(in reference to my school district boundary dispute), I was <br /> frankly surprised that the Town of York Board,considering the overwhelming opposition by almost all <br /> adjoining property owners, would consider action on this issue. <br /> The Town of York Board and county officials must realize the very dangerous precedent that it sets if it <br /> considers the request of Mr Snuthback There is a very clear trend in and around north-cast Dane County <br /> for housing development and the disappearance of farmland The ill-conceived development plan of Mark <br /> Srnithback clearly precipitates the trend of poor land use planning. <br /> Sincere y, <br /> James D. Gage <br /> 281 Highway TV <br /> Waterloo, WI 53594 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.