|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-06101
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-06101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2016 1:32:04 PM
Creation date
2/15/2016 1:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
06101
Town
Dunn Township
Section Numbers
26
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-06101
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. James Gregorius <br /> February 28, 2001 <br /> Page2 <br /> zoning at such time they no longer reside on the property. A <br /> copy of said agreement shall be recorded at the Dane County <br /> Register of Deeds office. <br /> The condition does provide a date certain by which a restrictive covenant including the <br /> condition must be recorded, as required by the ordinance. Furthermore, the condition does <br /> not purport to restrict or bind the property. Rather, it purports to bind the owners. It would <br /> be permissible for the town and the owners to enter into such an agreement. But, this is not <br /> the type of restriction that runs with the land and is appropriate for a restrictive covenant or <br /> deed restriction. Therefore, it is not an appropriate condition for conditional zoning pursuant <br /> to the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Although the terms of the condition were not valid under the conditional zoning ordinance, it <br /> was enacted by the County Board as an integral part of the amendment and approved by the <br /> town. The condition in question was added as an amendment by the board. Therefore, after <br /> final county action the matter was referred to the Town of Dunn, pursuant to §59.69(5)(e)6, <br /> Stats. The town then had 40 days to file a resolution disapproving the zoning petition as <br /> amended. In this case, Ordinance Amendment No. 6101 was submitted to the town with the <br /> condition in question as approved by the county board. The condition was clearly included at <br /> the request of the town and their approval (failure to disapprove) was based upon its <br /> inclusion. <br /> The town had a statutory right to disapprove Amendment No. 6101. Regardless of whether <br /> the condition was a valid exercise of conditional zoning, the town approved the amendment <br /> with the condition. Although the terms of the condition may not be binding, it is my opinion <br /> that the rezone did not become effective due to the failure to comply with the express <br /> language of the amendment, "the rezone shall be effective upon execution of an agreement <br /> with the Town of Dunn..." <br /> Sincerely <br /> /avid R. Gault <br /> Assistant Corporation Counsel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.