|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-06274
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-06274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 11:29:49 AM
Creation date
2/18/2016 11:29:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
06274
Town
Deerfield Township
Section Numbers
10
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-06274
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a 1 668 241 4287 INTER. =EED. CO° 01 <br /> II <br /> May 9 , 1995 <br /> Mr , Lyman F . Anderson <br /> Dane County 4orinq Committee <br /> Regarding PEt it ion #6274 by Nolan Anderson seeking to change a <br /> parcel of lard from RH2-RHRA . <br /> I <br /> I attended t hle Town hearing and spoke in apos-i t i on to the change , <br /> My wife and -family live across the County highway from the <br /> proposed construction . We are strongly opposed to zoning changes <br /> which would change the neighborhood from its current single <br /> family status to one of commercial duplex status . I ! the <br /> Andersons are allowed to do that , there is no good reason why <br /> others (,arinot', follow . <br /> We understand, the personal nature of this request , ano admire the <br /> Nolan Anderson family tor their posit ion in regard to the <br /> family relationship with the Pav1aks . However , I also understand <br /> the pr cif essi c>Irral pr oper t v development aspect of those tame l i es , <br /> and suspect that there is an underlying expectation that , it they <br /> .c)uld get by with it , they would do this development in such a <br /> way / hat when the Pavlar;c; no longer need to live there , the <br /> properl v could be rented out to two tami l ies or occupied by an <br /> owner who would rent the other s.;ide . This is the development <br /> option to wh i ;h we are opposed . <br /> We would be happy to have the Pavlaks as neighbors in a single <br /> family dwe i l i ng that is planned and constructed according to <br /> ioning regulaftions . I resent the implication made by Mrs . Pavlak <br /> at the ' own hearing that opposition to the rezoning meant that <br /> the neighbors' did not want them in the community . For my part , <br /> that i .; ahsoltely not true . <br /> Rec -acct rul ly , <br /> axles L . Pryor <br /> 704 Cottage Grove Rd <br /> Deerfield , WI 53531 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.